From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aniroop.mathur@gmail.com, s.samuel@samsung.com,
r.mahale@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v5]Input: evdev: fix bug of dropping full valid packet after syn_dropped
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:52:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113185239.GC39593@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452686262-6684-1-git-send-email-a.mathur@samsung.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:27:41PM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> If last event in old queue that was dropped was EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT, then
> lets generate EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT immediately after queing EV_SYN/SYN_DROPPED
> so that clients would not ignore next valid full packet events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/evdev.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> index e9ae3d5..0bc7b98 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/evdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,12 @@ static void __evdev_flush_queue(struct evdev_client *client, unsigned int type)
> static void __evdev_queue_syn_dropped(struct evdev_client *client)
> {
> struct input_event ev;
> + struct input_event *prev_ev;
> ktime_t time;
> + unsigned int mask = client->bufsize - 1;
> +
> + /* store previous event */
> + prev_ev = &client->buffer[(client->head - 1) & mask];
How do you know that previous event is valid/exists? In fact, when we
are dropping events due to the full queue, you will be referencing the
newest event being processed, not the previous event.
I also wonder if this code is safe with regard to __evdev_flush_queue()
that is dropping bunch of events and possible empty SYN_REPORT groups.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 11:57 [PATCH] [v5]Input: evdev: fix bug of dropping full valid packet after syn_dropped Aniroop Mathur
2016-01-13 18:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-01-13 20:28 ` Aniroop Mathur
2016-01-14 17:52 ` Aniroop Mathur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113185239.GC39593@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=a.mathur@samsung.com \
--cc=aniroop.mathur@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r.mahale@samsung.com \
--cc=s.samuel@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).