From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pyra-handheld.com, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] input: twl6040-vibra: remove mutex
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:20:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160418212048.GB1006@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <592912a81a86fe0c9b5eaf3407cc5c4e1bfef9fe.1461009340.git.hns@goldelico.com>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:55:41PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> The mutex does not seem to be needed.
twl6040_vibra_suspend() and vibra_play_work() may run concurrently, no?
> twl4030-vibra doesn't
> use one either.
It probably should.
Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c | 15 +--------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> index 69c5940..dcc926b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct vibra_info {
> struct device *dev;
> struct input_dev *input_dev;
> struct work_struct play_work;
> - struct mutex mutex;
> +
> int irq;
>
> bool enabled;
> @@ -182,8 +182,6 @@ static void vibra_play_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct vibra_info *info = container_of(work,
> struct vibra_info, play_work);
>
> - mutex_lock(&info->mutex);
> -
> if (info->weak_speed || info->strong_speed) {
> if (!info->enabled)
> twl6040_vibra_enable(info);
> @@ -192,7 +190,6 @@ static void vibra_play_work(struct work_struct *work)
> } else if (info->enabled)
> twl6040_vibra_disable(info);
>
> - mutex_unlock(&info->mutex);
> }
>
> static int vibra_play(struct input_dev *input, void *data,
> @@ -223,12 +220,8 @@ static void twl6040_vibra_close(struct input_dev *input)
>
> cancel_work_sync(&info->play_work);
>
> - mutex_lock(&info->mutex);
> -
> if (info->enabled)
> twl6040_vibra_disable(info);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&info->mutex);
> }
>
> static int __maybe_unused twl6040_vibra_suspend(struct device *dev)
> @@ -236,13 +229,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused twl6040_vibra_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct vibra_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> - mutex_lock(&info->mutex);
> -
> if (info->enabled)
> twl6040_vibra_disable(info);
>
> - mutex_unlock(&info->mutex);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -301,8 +290,6 @@ static int twl6040_vibra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - mutex_init(&info->mutex);
> -
> error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->irq, NULL,
> twl6040_vib_irq_handler,
> IRQF_ONESHOT,
> --
> 2.7.3
>
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-18 19:55 [PATCH 0/5] fixes for twl6040-vibra H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] input: twl6040-vibra: fix DT node memory management H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 21:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-19 7:43 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-19 17:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-20 9:03 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-05-08 6:49 ` [Kernel] " H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-05-10 0:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] input: twl6040-vibra: add handler to unregister input if module is removed H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 21:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-19 7:33 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-19 7:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-19 8:05 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-19 16:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-20 9:12 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] input: twl6040-vibra: fix NULL pointer dereference by removing workqueue H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 21:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] input: twl6040-vibra: ignore return value of schedule_work H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 21:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] input: twl6040-vibra: remove mutex H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-18 21:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-04-19 7:49 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-19 8:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-19 8:08 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-20 9:22 ` [Letux-kernel] " H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-20 17:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-20 18:10 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-04-20 18:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-20 19:00 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160418212048.GB1006@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=kernel@pyra-handheld.com \
--cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).