From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] Input: gpio_keys: set input direction explicitly for gpio keys
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:36:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116173656.GA335@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479303734-16198-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:42:14PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Commit 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device
> properties") switched to use generic device properties for GPIO keys and
> commit 5feeca3c1e39 ("Input: gpio_keys - add support for GPIO descriptors")
> switched from legacy GPIO numbers to GPIO descriptors.
>
> Previously devm_gpio_request_one was explicitly passed GPIOF_DIR_IN flag
> to set the GPIO direction as input. However devm_get_gpiod_from_child
> doesn't have such provisions and hence fwnode_get_named_gpiod can't set
> it as input.
>
> This breaks few platforms with the following error:
> " gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
> unable to lock HW IRQ <n> for IRQ
> genirq: Failed to request resources for POWER (irq <x>) on irqchip
> gpio_keys: Unable to claim irq <x>; error -22
> gpio-keys: probe failed with error -22 "
>
> This patch fixes the issue by setting input direction explicitly for
> gpio input keys. It also remove the existing GPIOF_DIR_IN flag setting
> for the legacy gpios and merges into single gpiod_direction_input call.
>
> Fixes: 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device properties")
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> v1->v2:
> - Fix the build(had sent a wrong version by accident)
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> The other option would be to pass the flag explicitly and add support to
> handle it in the path devm_get_gpiod_from_child would take.
Hi Sudeep,
No, I think explicitly configuring it for input is good (at least for
now), but we need error handling.
Thanks!
>
> Let me know your opinion.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> index 5576f2ae0b71..f5e2d377f5c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
> * Legacy GPIO number, so request the GPIO here and
> * convert it to descriptor.
> */
> - unsigned flags = GPIOF_IN;
> + unsigned flags = 0;
>
> if (button->active_low)
> flags |= GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW;
> @@ -521,6 +521,9 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
>
> if (bdata->gpiod) {
> + /* set the GPIO direction to input */
> + gpiod_direction_input(bdata->gpiod);
> +
> if (button->debounce_interval) {
> error = gpiod_set_debounce(bdata->gpiod,
> button->debounce_interval * 1000);
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> index 72b350315d43..56bf0dc5e2e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * Legacy GPIO number so request the GPIO here and
> * convert it to descriptor.
> */
> - unsigned flags = GPIOF_IN;
> + unsigned flags = 0;
>
> if (button->active_low)
> flags |= GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW;
> @@ -342,6 +342,9 @@ static int gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + /* set the GPIO direction to input */
> + gpiod_direction_input(bdata->gpiod);
> +
> bdata->last_state = -1;
> bdata->threshold = DIV_ROUND_UP(button->debounce_interval,
> pdata->poll_interval);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 11:54 [PATCH -next] Input: gpio_keys: set input direction explicitly for gpio keys Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 12:43 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16 12:48 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 " Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 17:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-11-16 17:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 18:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-16 18:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 " Sudeep Holla
2016-11-17 1:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-17 9:48 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161116173656.GA335@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).