From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Shyti Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent from each other Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:40:56 +0900 Message-ID: <20170103144056.4ft2ohmhgmezeney@jack.zhora.eu> References: <1483430237-26823-1-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <1483430237-26823-4-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <20170103095842.h3hl64amje4qv4ts@gangnam.samsung> <20170103102548.73jg6qddlcthe2mu@gangnam.samsung> <20170103115530.zhjwn7bzmqmumy23@gangnam.samsung> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Andi Shyti , Chanwoo Choi , Mark Rutland , devicetree , linux-samsung-soc , Dmitry Torokhov , Catalin Marinas , Jaechul Lee , Will Deacon , linux-kernel , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Chanwoo Choi , Rob Herring , Kukjin Kim , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, galaxyra@gmail.com, beomho.seo@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, > FWIW, I also agree with Chanwoo that the difference is too small to > need a common .dtsi file. in principle I don't like "switching on and off" properties by overwriting them with "status = disable", unless it's really necessary (and this case is not). Even for small differences. It makes the DTS harder to read and duplicates nodes with different values throughout the DTS include chain. In my opinion this approach should be discouraged. Besides, there are other overwritten differences in tm2e.dts that I think should be separated as well. The "common" file approach is widely used in arm/boot/dts/exynos* files. The "status = disable" looks to me more like a temporary hack rather than a permanent solution. In any case, still up to you :) Andi