From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Shyti Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent from each other Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:53:57 +0900 Message-ID: <20170106135357.n4ugkcdcog4hzbhe@gangnam.samsung> References: <20170106134350.32428-1-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <20170106134350.32428-3-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <20170106134929.mj7wqalp7lpkfm6b@kozik-lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20170106134929.mj7wqalp7lpkfm6b@kozik-lap> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , Catalin Marinas , Jaechul Lee , Dmitry Torokhov , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Javier Martinez Canillas , Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andi Shyti , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jaechul Lee , Beomho Seo List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi Krzysztof, > > -#include "exynos5433-tm2.dts" > > +#include "exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi" > > > > / { > > model = "Samsung TM2E board"; > > Where are the regulators? No need, they were already overwriting the original property, so with your suggestion they didn't change in tm2e. That's why I like your suggestion. Originally I added the 'regulator' label to not have empty nodes. Andi