From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: silead - Do not try to directly access the GPIO when using ACPI pm Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:32:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20170202123206.GP2053@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20170122200008.27027-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20170122222015.GA31009@dtor-ws> <8a23b7b2-a7aa-d62d-947d-31301a0c92cc@redhat.com> <20170201174257.GE40045@dtor-ws> <20170202104130.GJ2053@lahna.fi.intel.com> <8e91084e-e0ea-b055-5c62-67a4e0e56df4@redhat.com> <20170202121018.GN2053@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:38408 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488AbdBBMim (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 07:38:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170202121018.GN2053@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Hans de Goede Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , "russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" , Gregor Riepl , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > I do not have a copy of the patch in this thread but sounds like > something that might work. Actually, I seem have a copy of that patch. So you are saying that the device has a power GPIO in ACPI _CRS but it should not be used for some reason?