From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: silead - Do not try to directly access the GPIO when using ACPI pm Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:35:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20170310103505.GZ2957@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1488969002.20145.119.camel@linux.intel.com> <1488973582.20145.125.camel@linux.intel.com> <654981a1-2493-01d6-13e6-1287b70e22f2@redhat.com> <1488997525.20145.161.camel@linux.intel.com> <114fa24e-b726-28e1-66c7-aa90bcf5c966@redhat.com> <1489068196.20145.169.camel@linux.intel.com> <93370dd7-f017-ff3a-5518-b01820452867@redhat.com> <97099577-181d-ac94-4d9e-ab5ca64f9ff6@redhat.com> <20170309213200.GF20077@dtor-ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:16076 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934974AbdCJKfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:35:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170309213200.GF20077@dtor-ws> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Vetter , "russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" , Gregor Riepl , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:32:00PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > It looks like IoRestriction enforcement should be optional and it is > another thing to be tweaked in drivers/platform/x86/whatever.c If the firmware says the pin is only to be used as output, I don't think it is really good idea to make that kind of enforcement optional.