From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718102339.28726-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718102339.28726-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
Changes since v2:
* documentation updates. Hopefully better wording now
Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..e46c24d65c8556
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+Linux I2C and DMA
+-----------------
+
+Given that I2C is a low-speed bus where largely small messages are transferred,
+it is not considered a prime user of DMA access. At this time of writing, only
+10% of I2C bus master drivers have DMA support implemented. And the vast
+majority of transactions are so small that setting up DMA for it will likely
+add more overhead than a plain PIO transfer.
+
+Therefore, it is *not* mandatory that the buffer of an I2C message is DMA safe.
+It does not seem reasonable to apply additional burdens when the feature is so
+rarely used. However, it is recommended to use a DMA-safe buffer if your
+message size is likely applicable for DMA. Most drivers have this threshold
+around 8 bytes. As of today, this is mostly an educated guess, however.
+
+To support this scenario, drivers wishing to implement DMA can use helper
+functions from the I2C core. One checks if a message is DMA capable in terms of
+size and memory type. It can optionally also create a bounce buffer:
+
+ i2c_check_msg_for_dma(msg, threshold, &bounce_buf);
+
+The bounce buffer handling from the core is generic and simple. It will always
+allocate a new bounce buffer. If you want a more sophisticated handling (e.g.
+reusing pre-allocated buffers), you can leave the pointer to the bounce buffer
+empty and implement your own handling based on the return value of the above
+function.
+
+The other helper function releases the bounce buffer. It ensures data is copied
+back to the message:
+
+ i2c_release_dma_bounce_buf(msg, bounce_buf);
+
+Please check the in-kernel documentation for details. The i2c-sh_mobile driver
+can be used as a reference example.
+
+If you plan to use DMA with I2C (or with any other bus, actually) make sure you
+have CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG enabled during development. It can help you find
+various issues which can be complex to debug otherwise.
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 10:23 [PATCH v3 0/4] i2c: document DMA handling and add helpers for it Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20170718102339.28726-1-wsa+renesas-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-18 10:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: add helpers to ease DMA handling Wolfram Sang
2017-07-19 9:28 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-07-23 11:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <20170723122242.7fd0edf4-tko9wxEg+fIOOJlXag/Snyp2UmYkHbXO@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-16 20:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-08-16 14:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-16 16:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-07-18 10:23 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-07-19 9:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify " Niklas Söderlund
[not found] ` <20170718102339.28726-3-wsa+renesas-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-23 11:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-18 10:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: sh_mobile: use helper to decide if DMA is useful Wolfram Sang
2017-07-19 9:35 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-07-18 10:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] i2c: rcar: check for DMA-capable buffers Wolfram Sang
2017-07-19 9:42 ` Niklas Söderlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170718102339.28726-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).