From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Do not bind to CHPN0001 touchscreen
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:39:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817193912.hccxyjwstrtr5oiv@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170722185537.12696-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1383 bytes --]
Hey guys,
Sorry, I don't understand some of the stuff here. But I'd like to
understand it before I add something to the I2C core. Especially as it
feels a bit a the edge of the driver model to me.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The CHPN0001 ACPI device has a _CID of PNP0C50 but is not HID compatible,
> it uses its own protocol which is handled by the chipone_icn8318 driver.
>
> If the i2c_hid_driver's probe functon gets called it will fail with a
> "hid_descr_cmd failed" error.
That sounds like it fails pretty late. I'd assume we could check the
blacklist right at the beginning of probe and bail out immediately?
> Worse, after the probe failure the i2c / ACPI core code will put the ACPI
> device in D3 state
Where does that happen? Sorry, I can't find it. Would it be an idea to
add a flag somewhere telling the device should not be put into D3? That
would be way more generic in case this happens outside I2C world, or?
Disclaimer: I am brainstorming here, don't know super much about ACPI.
> This commit adds a match callback and returns -ENODEV for i2c_client-s
> with a CHPN0001 ACPI device id, so that the probe function never gets
> called, fixing the controller losing its firmware.
Do you know if something like a match-callback exists somewhere else in
the kernel?
Regards,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-22 18:55 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Allow the driver to override the default i2c_bus match behavior Hans de Goede
2017-07-22 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Do not bind to CHPN0001 touchscreen Hans de Goede
2017-07-24 8:19 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-07-25 12:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-07-25 13:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-07-25 13:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-08-17 19:39 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-08-17 22:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-08-28 13:04 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-28 16:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-08-28 16:46 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-28 12:44 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-28 12:50 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-29 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-29 8:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-08-14 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Allow the driver to override the default i2c_bus match behavior Hans de Goede
2017-08-14 21:21 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170817193912.hccxyjwstrtr5oiv@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox