From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peter.hutterer@who-t.net, arnd@arndb.de, y2038@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] input: evdev: Replace timeval with timespec64
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 22:46:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102064617.zmv6ospfkectaa37@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218051844.10193-3-deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Hi Deepa,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 09:18:43PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
>
> All references to timeval in the kernel will be replaced
> by y2038 safe structures.
> Replace all references to timeval with y2038 safe
> struct timespec64 here.
>
> struct input_event will be changed in a different patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> ---
> drivers/input/evdev.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> index 0193dd4f0452..3171c4882d80 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/evdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> @@ -156,15 +156,22 @@ static void __evdev_flush_queue(struct evdev_client *client, unsigned int type)
> static void __evdev_queue_syn_dropped(struct evdev_client *client)
> {
> struct input_event ev;
> - ktime_t time;
> + struct timespec64 ts;
>
> - time = client->clk_type == EV_CLK_REAL ?
> - ktime_get_real() :
> - client->clk_type == EV_CLK_MONO ?
> - ktime_get() :
> - ktime_get_boottime();
> + switch (client->clk_type) {
> + case EV_CLK_REAL:
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
> + break;
> + case EV_CLK_MONO:
> + ktime_get_ts64(&ts);
> + break;
> + case EV_CLK_BOOT:
> + get_monotonic_boottime64(&ts);
> + break;
> + }
>
> - ev.time = ktime_to_timeval(time);
> + ev.time.tv_sec = ts.tv_sec;
> + ev.time.tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> ev.type = EV_SYN;
> ev.code = SYN_DROPPED;
> ev.value = 0;
> @@ -257,17 +264,20 @@ static void __pass_event(struct evdev_client *client,
>
> static void evdev_pass_values(struct evdev_client *client,
> const struct input_value *vals, unsigned int count,
> - ktime_t *ev_time)
> + struct timespec64 *ev_time)
> {
> struct evdev *evdev = client->evdev;
> const struct input_value *v;
> struct input_event event;
> + struct timespec64 ts;
> bool wakeup = false;
>
> if (client->revoked)
> return;
>
> - event.time = ktime_to_timeval(ev_time[client->clk_type]);
> + ts = ev_time[client->clk_type];
> + event.time.tv_sec = ts.tv_sec;
> + event.time.tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
>
> /* Interrupts are disabled, just acquire the lock. */
> spin_lock(&client->buffer_lock);
> @@ -304,12 +314,11 @@ static void evdev_events(struct input_handle *handle,
> {
> struct evdev *evdev = handle->private;
> struct evdev_client *client;
> - ktime_t ev_time[EV_CLK_MAX];
> + struct timespec64 ev_time[EV_CLK_MAX];
>
> - ev_time[EV_CLK_MONO] = ktime_get();
> - ev_time[EV_CLK_REAL] = ktime_mono_to_real(ev_time[EV_CLK_MONO]);
> - ev_time[EV_CLK_BOOT] = ktime_mono_to_any(ev_time[EV_CLK_MONO],
> - TK_OFFS_BOOT);
> + ktime_get_ts64(&ev_time[EV_CLK_MONO]);
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ev_time[EV_CLK_REAL]);
> + get_monotonic_boottime64(&ev_time[EV_CLK_BOOT]);
This may result in different ev_time[] members holding different times,
whereas the original code would take one time sample and convert it to
different clocks.
Also, why can't we keep using ktime_t internally? It is y2038 safe,
right? I think you should drop this patch and adjust the 3rd one to
massage the input event timestamp patch to do ktime->timespec64->input
timestamp conversion.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 5:18 [PATCH v5 0/3] Make input drivers y2038 safe Deepa Dinamani
2017-12-18 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] uinput: Use monotonic times for uinput timestamps Deepa Dinamani
2018-01-02 6:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-12-18 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] input: evdev: Replace timeval with timespec64 Deepa Dinamani
2018-01-02 6:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2018-01-02 15:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-06 21:43 ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-01-08 20:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-12-18 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] input: Deprecate real timestamps beyond year 2106 Deepa Dinamani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102064617.zmv6ospfkectaa37@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).