From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Nick Dyer <nick@shmanahar.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix reset-gpio for level based irqs
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:42:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420194207.i2zo235duknjsjjd@earth.universe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b4976b0a8a642767bd4e0a5e9d7fb6c9dc86ec9.camel@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3719 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:44:02PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 19:24 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > The current reset-gpio support triggers an interrupt storm on platforms
> > using the maxtouch with level based interrupt. The Motorola Droid 4,
> > which I used for some of the tests is not affected, since it uses a level
> > based interrupt.
> >
>
> I found this confusing. Interrupt storm happen with level-based interrupts,
> but the Droid4 is not affected?
This is a typo. Droid 4 has an edge based interrupt defined, PPD has
an level based interrupt defined. PPD got an interrupt storm, Droid 4
did not.
> > This change avoids the interrupt storm by enabling the device while
> > its interrupt is disabled. The following mxt_initialize() requires,
> > that the device is responsive (at least mxt224E is unresponsive for
> > ~22ms), so we wait some time. We don't wait for leaving bootloader
> > mode anymore, since mxt_initialize() checks for it anyways.
> >
>
> IMHO, having some more or less arbritrary sleeps is almost
> always a problem. This value might be enough for some platform,
> might be too short for some other, and then it might get too large
> for someone else.
The 22ms chip-being-unresponsive are not newly introduced. The
same 22ms are also required for soft-reset. I did introduce a
new time (MXT_RESET_GPIO_TIME) for the "chip being reset" state,
since my randomly chosen 200ms from before were exaggerated
considering all mxt datasheets I checked stated only a few nano
seconds.
> > This fixes a boot problem on GE PPD (watchdog kills device) and also
> > has been tested on the Droid 4.
> >
> > Fixes: f657b00df22e ("Input: atmel_mxt_ts - add support for reset line")
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 15 +++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > index 5d9699fe1b55..f8a9f2a47e78 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ enum t100_type {
> >
> > /* Delay times */
> > #define MXT_BACKUP_TIME 50 /* msec */
> > +#define MXT_RESET_GPIO_TIME 20 /* msec */
> > #define MXT_RESET_TIME 200 /* msec */
> > #define MXT_RESET_TIMEOUT 3000 /* msec */
> > #define MXT_CRC_TIMEOUT 1000 /* msec */
> > @@ -3167,20 +3168,14 @@ static int mxt_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > + disable_irq(client->irq);
> > +
> > if (data->reset_gpio) {
> > - data->in_bootloader = true;
> > - msleep(MXT_RESET_TIME);
> > - reinit_completion(&data->bl_completion);
> > + msleep(MXT_RESET_GPIO_TIME);
> > gpiod_set_value(data->reset_gpio, 1);
>
> Can't we enable the IRQ here, just before the wait...
>
> > - error = mxt_wait_for_completion(data, &data->bl_completion,
> > - MXT_RESET_TIMEOUT);
>
> ... and then disable it back afterwards?
Yes and no. We need the wait, since the interrupt pin does random
stuff for 100ms after reset. We can do the wait-for-completion
after that time (see mxt_soft_reset function). I kept it simple,
since the following init does another soft reset anyways.
> > - if (error)
> > - return error;
> > - data->in_bootloader = false;
> > + msleep(MXT_RESET_TIME);
>
> > }
> >
> > - disable_irq(client->irq);
> > -
> > error = mxt_initialize(data);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 17:24 [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix reset-gpio for level based irqs Sebastian Reichel
2018-04-20 17:44 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-04-20 19:42 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2018-04-21 20:11 ` Nick Dyer
2018-04-23 11:43 ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-04-23 11:58 ` [PATCHv2] " Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-03 9:15 ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-09 14:25 ` Pavel Machek
2018-05-09 14:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2018-05-24 16:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180420194207.i2zo235duknjsjjd@earth.universe \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@shmanahar.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).