Wed, May 09, 2018 at 05:33:13PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi NIck,
> 
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0300, Nick Simonov wrote:
> > This is a patch to the input.c file that fixes
> > up warning found by checkpatch.pl tool
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Simonov <nicksimonovv@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/input.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
> > index 9785546..e18fdae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/input.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/input.c
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >  /*
> >   * The input core
> >   *
> > @@ -252,7 +253,8 @@ static int input_handle_abs_event(struct input_dev *dev,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Flush pending "slot" event */
> > -	if (is_mt_event && mt && mt->slot != input_abs_get_val(dev, ABS_MT_SLOT)) {
> > +	if (is_mt_event && mt && mt->slot !=
> > +		input_abs_get_val(dev, ABS_MT_SLOT)) {
> >  		input_abs_set_val(dev, ABS_MT_SLOT, mt->slot);
> 
> So now it is not immediately clear what is part of condition and what is
> part of body.
> 
> I am sorry to say, but with most of these changes the cure is worse than
> the disease. If you were fixing the code and adjusted the affected lines
> so they are under 80 columns limit that would be one thing, but just
> reformatting for the sake of it is not really helpful.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

Dmitry thanks for your comment. I deleted all my changes except one
and prepare a new patch for it. 

In function input_set_capability when it go through default statment 
it is use hard coded function name "input_set_capability" in pr_err() call.
I replace it using "%s" __func__ instead.