From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - mark expected switch fall-through Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20181008140748.GA10114@embeddedor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" part at the beginning of the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114757 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c index 594f72e..24bc5c5 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void xenkbd_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break; -- 2.7.4