From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Lukas Kahnert <openproggerfreak@gmail.com>,
Marc <suaefar@googlemail.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / platform: Add SMB0001 HID to forbidden_id_list
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:06:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181119180601.962-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
Many HP AMD based laptops contain an SMB0001 device like this:
Device (SMBD)
{
Name (_HID, "SMB0001") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
IO (Decode16,
0x0B20, // Range Minimum
0x0B20, // Range Maximum
0x20, // Alignment
0x20, // Length
)
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, )
{7}
})
}
The legacy style IRQ resource here causes acpi_dev_get_irqresource() to
be called with legacy=true and this message to show in dmesg:
ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high
This causes issues when later on the AMD0030 GPIO device gets enumerated:
Device (GPIO)
{
Name (_HID, "AMDI0030") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "AMDI0030") // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_UID, Zero) // _UID: Unique ID
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared, ,, )
{
0x00000007,
}
Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
0xFED81500, // Address Base
0x00000400, // Address Length
)
})
Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.GPIO._CRS.RBUF */
}
}
Now acpi_dev_get_irqresource() gets called with legacy=false, but because
of the earlier override of the trigger-type acpi_register_gsi() returns
-EBUSY (because we try to register the same interrupt with a different
trigger-type) and we end up setting IORESOURCE_DISABLED in the flags.
The setting of IORESOURCE_DISABLED causes platform_get_irq() to call
acpi_irq_get() which is not implemented on x86 and returns -EINVAL.
resulting in the following in dmesg:
amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to get gpio IRQ: -22
amd_gpio: probe of AMDI0030:00 failed with error -22
The SMB0001 is a "virtual" device in the sense that the only way the OS
interacts with it is through calling a couple of methods to do SMBus
transfers. As such it is weird that it has IO and IRQ resources at all,
because the driver for it is not expected to ever access the hardware
directly.
The Linux driver for the SMB0001 device directly binds to the acpi_device
through the acpi_bus, so we do not need to instantiate a platform_device
for this ACPI device. This commit adds the SMB0001 HID to the
forbidden_id_list, avoiding the instantiating of a platform_device for it.
Not instantiating a platform_device means we will no longer call
acpi_dev_get_irqresource() for the legacy IRQ resource fixing the probe of
the AMDI0030 device failing.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644013
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198715
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199523
Reported-by: Lukas Kahnert <openproggerfreak@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Marc <suaefar@googlemail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
index eaa60c94205a..1f32caa87686 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
{"PNP0200", 0}, /* AT DMA Controller */
{"ACPI0009", 0}, /* IOxAPIC */
{"ACPI000A", 0}, /* IOAPIC */
+ {"SMB0001", 0}, /* ACPI SMBUS virtual device */
{"", 0},
};
--
2.19.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-19 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 18:06 Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-11-21 10:37 ` [PATCH] ACPI / platform: Add SMB0001 HID to forbidden_id_list Hans de Goede
2018-11-21 10:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181119180601.962-1-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openproggerfreak@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suaefar@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).