From: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>,
Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: uinput: Avoid Object-Already-Free with a global lock
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:43:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418014321.dptin7tpxpldhsns@penguin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7299a6db-38b7-75c7-633a-00d2257eba45@codeaurora.org>
Hi Mukesh,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 03:35:51PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Can you please have a look at this patch ? as this seems to reproducing
> quite frequently
>
> Thanks,
> Mukesh
>
> On 4/10/2019 1:29 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > uinput_destroy_device() gets called from two places. In one place,
> > uinput_ioctl_handler() where it is protected under a lock
> > udev->mutex but there is no protection on udev device from freeing
> > inside uinput_release().
uinput_release() should be called when last file handle to the uinput
instance is being dropped, so there should be no other users and thus we
can't be racing with anyone.
> >
> > This can result in Object-Already-Free case where uinput parent
> > device already got freed while a child being inserted inside it.
> > That result in a double free case for parent while kernfs_put()
> > being done for child in a failure path of adding a node.
Can you please describe scenario in more detail? How do you free the
parent device while child input device is being registered?
Thanks.
-
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 7:59 [PATCH v2] Input: uinput: Avoid Object-Already-Free with a global lock Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-15 10:05 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-18 1:43 ` dmitry.torokhov [this message]
[not found] ` <bb92c3f2-faf1-04ec-4c67-3aba56c507a9@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <a4d1a2f3-1db7-e300-9569-7b7a2fadd64e@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-19 7:11 ` dmitry.torokhov
2019-04-19 8:43 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-23 3:28 ` dmitry.torokhov
[not found] ` <17f4a0be-ab04-8537-9197-32fbca807f3f@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-23 8:49 ` dmitry.torokhov
2019-04-23 11:06 ` Al Viro
2019-04-23 12:15 ` Al Viro
2019-04-24 12:10 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-24 13:07 ` Al Viro
2019-04-24 14:09 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-24 22:56 ` Al Viro
2019-05-01 7:50 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190418014321.dptin7tpxpldhsns@penguin \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martink@posteo.de \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox