From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>,
Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: uinput: Avoid Object-Already-Free with a global lock
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:07:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424130711.GP2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5614f04f-827d-1668-9ed0-60d93e110b8e@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:40:40PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> Al,
>
> i tried to put traceprintk inside ioctl after fdget and fdput on a simple
> call of open => ioctl => close
in a loop, and multithreaded, presumably?
> on /dev/uinput.
>
> uinput-532 [002] .... 45.312044: SYSC_ioctl: 2 <= f_count
> > <After fdget()
> uinput-532 [002] .... 45.312055: SYSC_ioctl: 2
> <After fdput()
> uinput-532 [004] .... 45.313766: uinput_open: uinput: 1
> uinput-532 [004] .... 45.313783: SYSC_ioctl: 1
> uinput-532 [004] .... 45.313788: uinput_ioctl_handler:
> uinput: uinput_ioctl_handler, 1
> uinput-532 [004] .... 45.313835: SYSC_ioctl: 1
> uinput-532 [004] .... 45.313843: uinput_release: uinput: 0
>
>
> So while a ioctl is running the f_count is 1, so a fput could be run and do
> atomic_long_dec_and_test
> this could call release right ?
Look at ksys_ioctl():
int ksys_ioctl(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
int error;
struct fd f = fdget(fd);
an error or refcount bumped
if (!f.file)
return -EBADF;
not an error, then. We know that ->release() won't be called
until we drop the reference we've just acquired.
error = security_file_ioctl(f.file, cmd, arg);
if (!error)
error = do_vfs_ioctl(f.file, fd, cmd, arg);
... and we are done with calling ->ioctl(), so
fdput(f);
... we drop the reference we'd acquired.
Seeing refcount 1 inside ->ioctl() is possible, all right:
CPU1: ioctl(2) resolves fd to struct file *, refcount 2
CPU2: close(2) rips struct file * from descriptor table and does fput() to drop it;
refcount reaches 1 and fput() is done; no call of ->release() yet.
CPU1: we get arouund to ->ioctl(), where your trace sees refcount 1
CPU1: done with ->ioctl(), drop our reference. *NOW* refcount gets to 0, and
->release() is called.
IOW, in your trace fput() has already been run by close(2); having somebody else
do that again while we are in ->ioctl() would be a bug (to start with, where
did they get that struct file * and why wasn't that reference contributing to
struct file refcount?)
In all cases we only call ->release() once all references gone - both
the one(s) in descriptor tables and any transient ones acquired by
fdget(), etc.
I would really like to see a reproducer for the original use-after-free report...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 7:59 [PATCH v2] Input: uinput: Avoid Object-Already-Free with a global lock Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-15 10:05 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-18 1:43 ` dmitry.torokhov
[not found] ` <bb92c3f2-faf1-04ec-4c67-3aba56c507a9@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <a4d1a2f3-1db7-e300-9569-7b7a2fadd64e@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-19 7:11 ` dmitry.torokhov
2019-04-19 8:43 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-23 3:28 ` dmitry.torokhov
[not found] ` <17f4a0be-ab04-8537-9197-32fbca807f3f@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-23 8:49 ` dmitry.torokhov
2019-04-23 11:06 ` Al Viro
2019-04-23 12:15 ` Al Viro
2019-04-24 12:10 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-24 13:07 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-04-24 14:09 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-04-24 22:56 ` Al Viro
2019-05-01 7:50 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424130711.GP2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martink@posteo.de \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).