From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Tim Schumacher <timschumi@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] Input: iforce - remove "being used" silliness
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:24:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190619002448.GC62571@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3505434a-f5ec-de50-5f94-7347c6926f40@gmx.de>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:44:00PM +0200, Tim Schumacher wrote:
> On 19.09.18 19:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:51:26PM +0200, Tim Schumacher wrote:
> >> On 18.09.18 02:47, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>> The kernel is supposed to handle multiple devices, static flags
> >>> in packet handling code will never work.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> This is a random assortment of iforce patches that I made a few weeks back.
> >>>
> >>> Tim, I do not have hardware, so I was bound to screw it up, but if you
> >>> have some time I'd appreciate if you try them out (and if I indeed broke
> >>> things if you could identify issues that would be even more awesome).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >> Hello Dmitry,
> >>
> >> I tested those patches and I didn't find any obvious issues. The basic functions
> >> do work (i.e. buttons and axes, don't have a HAT so I can't test that), force
> >> feedback seems to work to the extent it was before (I only have fftest though,
> >> no games that support force feedback). I'll go through a few more applications
> >> and see if anything not obvious is broken.
> >>
> >
> > Thank you for taking a look.
> >
> >> Unfortunately, I only have that one wheel and I can only test USB connections
> >> at the moment (unless I find a proper serial adaptor, but I'm not sure if that
> >> would even work).
> >>
> >> Are those patches planned to go into 4.19 or are they intended to be merged in
> >> the next development cycle?
> >
> > Definitely not 4.19. Could be 4.20 or 4.21...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> as a followup to the last E-Mail I sent about this topic, the complete chain
> of patches has been in my personal tree since September of 2018 and there
> have been no issues so far as well. I tested a few more games and utilities,
> and I was able to test with multiple wheels simultaneously as well.
>
> In the end it's still your decision, but imo those patches should be fine
Thank you Tim, I'll put your name down as Tested-by then.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 0:47 [PATCH 01/20] Input: iforce - remove "being used" silliness Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 02/20] Input: iforce - introduce transport ops Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 03/20] Input: iforce - move get_id to the transport operations Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 04/20] Input: iforce - move command completion handling to serio code Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 05/20] Input: iforce - introduce start and stop io transport ops Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 06/20] Input: iforce - add bus type and parent arguments to iforce_init_device() Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 07/20] Input: iforce - move transport data into transport modules Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 08/20] Input: iforce - split into core and " Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 09/20] Input: iforce - use DMA-safe buffer when getting IDs from USB Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 10/20] Input: iforce - update formatting of switch statements Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 11/20] Input: iforce - factor out hat handling when parsing packets Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 12/20] Input: iforce - do not combine arguments for iforce_process_packet() Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 13/20] Input: iforce - signal command completion from transport code Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 14/20] Input: iforce - only call iforce_process_packet() if initialized Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 15/20] Input: iforce - allow callers supply data buffer when fetching device IDs Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 16/20] Input: iforce - use DMA-safe buffores for USB transfers Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 17/20] Input: only credit entropy when events are generated by a device Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 18/20] Input: iforce - drop bus type from iforce structure Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 19/20] Input: iforce - drop couple of temps from transport code Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 20/20] Input: iforce - use unaligned accessors, where appropriate Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 01/20] Input: iforce - remove "being used" silliness Tim Schumacher
2018-09-19 17:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-06-12 14:44 ` Tim Schumacher
2019-06-19 0:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190619002448.GC62571@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timschumi@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).