linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
	Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: uinput - Add UI_SET_UNIQ ioctl handler
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:53:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191202185340.nae4lljten5jqp3y@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191202175440.GA50317@dtor-ws>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3981 bytes --]

On Monday 02 December 2019 09:54:40 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 December 2019 17:23:05 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 03:53:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > > 
> > > > On Wednesday 27 November 2019 10:51:39 Abhishek Pandit-Subedi wrote:
> > > > > Support setting the uniq attribute of the input device. The uniq
> > > > > attribute is used as a unique identifier for the connected device.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For example, uinput devices created by BlueZ will store the address of
> > > > > the connected device as the uniq property.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/uinput.h b/include/uapi/linux/uinput.h
> > > > > index c9e677e3af1d..d5b7767c1b02 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/uinput.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/uinput.h
> > > > > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct uinput_abs_setup {
> > > > >  #define UI_SET_PHYS		_IOW(UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 108, char*)
> > > > >  #define UI_SET_SWBIT		_IOW(UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 109, int)
> > > > >  #define UI_SET_PROPBIT		_IOW(UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 110, int)
> > > > > +#define UI_SET_UNIQ		_IOW(UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 111, char*)
> > > > 
> > > > I think that usage of char* as type in _IOW would cause compatibility
> > > > problems like it is for UI_SET_PHYS (there is UI_SET_PHYS_COMPAT). Size
> > > > of char* pointer depends on userspace (32 vs 64bit), so 32bit process on
> > > > 64bit kernel would not be able to call this new UI_SET_UNIQ ioctl.
> > > > 
> > > > I would suggest to define this ioctl as e.g.:
> > > > 
> > > >   #define UI_SET_UNIQ		_IOW(_IOC_WRITE, UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 111, 0)
> > > > 
> > > > And then in uinput.c code handle it as:
> > > > 
> > > >   case UI_SET_UNIQ & ~IOCSIZE_MASK:
> > > > 
> > > > as part of section /* Now check variable-length commands */
> > > 
> > > If we did not have UI_SET_PHYS in its current form, I'd agree with you,
> > > but I think there is benefit in having UI_SET_UNIQ be similar to
> > > UI_SET_PHYS.
> > 
> > I thought that ioctl is just number, so we can define it as we want. And
> > because uinput.c has already switch for variable-length commands it
> > would be easy to use it. Final handling can be in separate function like
> > for UI_SET_PHYS which can look like same.
> 
> Yes, we can define ioctl number as whatever we want. What I was trying
> to say, right now users do this:
> 
> 	rc = ioctl(fd, UI_SET_PHYS, "whatever");
> 	...
> 
> and with UI_SET_UNIQ they expect the following to work:
> 
> 	rc = ioctl(fd, UI_SET_UNIQ, "whatever");
> 	...

And would not following definition

  #define UI_SET_UNIQ _IOW(_IOC_WRITE, UINPUT_IOCTL_BASE, 111, 0)

allow userspace to call

  rc = ioctl(fd, UI_SET_UNIQ, "whatever");

as you want?

> They would not expect a variable length IOCTL here, or expect a
> fixed-size string, nor do they expect to cast pointer to u64. So keeping
> the spirit of UI_SET_PHYS, even if it is not great from 64/32 bit point
> of view is beneficial here.
> 
> > 
> > > But you are absolutely correct that in current form the patch is
> > > deficient on 64/32 systems, and the compat handling needs to be added
> > > before it can be accepted.
> > 
> > Is not better to avoid usage of compat ioctl? Or it is OK to use compat
> > ioctl also for new features? I do not know if there are some kernel
> > rules for it or not... But for me it sounds like "compatibility layer
> > for older code".
> 
> Yes, if uinput driver did not have any compat code in it, we would not
> want to add it. But alas! we already need to handle compat cases for
> expsting API, so consistency is more important than purity (in my
> opinion) here.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-02 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 18:51 [PATCH] Input: uinput - Add UI_SET_UNIQ ioctl handler Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
2019-12-01 14:53 ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-02  1:23   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-02  8:47     ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-02 17:54       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-02 18:53         ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2019-12-02 19:36           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-02 22:54             ` Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
2019-12-02 23:09             ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-03 17:38               ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-03 19:11                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-04 12:02                   ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2019-12-04 21:59                   ` Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
2019-12-05 10:52                   ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-05 20:03                     ` Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
2019-12-06  9:11                       ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-06 17:40                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-16 21:57                           ` Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
2019-12-18 11:02                           ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-18 11:26                             ` Pali Rohár
2020-03-22 15:47                               ` Pali Rohár
2022-06-13 21:36                                 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2024-02-06 17:17                                   ` Chris Morgan
2024-02-06 17:44                                     ` Pali Rohár
2019-12-04  1:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2022-06-29  9:31 ` macmpi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191202185340.nae4lljten5jqp3y@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=abhishekpandit@chromium.org \
    --cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=kirr@nexedi.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).