From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D21C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F95864DCC for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229606AbhA1LKB (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:10:01 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2442 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229594AbhA1LJ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:09:59 -0500 Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DRHhN5xclz67hBF; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:05:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:09:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (10.47.74.140) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:09:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:08:33 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" CC: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "maz@kernel.org" , "linuxarm@openeuler.org" , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq Message-ID: <20210128110833.00000c43@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210107223926.35284-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> <848fb07c3073401bbbe15db71f5922c9@hisilicon.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.47.74.140] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml732-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.83) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:45 -0800 "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:49:21PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:38:28PM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > Hi Thomas, Greg, Dmitry, Marc, > > > Any further comment on this new API? > > > > It's not my subsystem, I'll let the irq maintainers handle it :) > > Not my subsystem either, but I would like to have this feature > available. I do not like calling irq_set_status_flags() before > request_irq() as at that time we are not ensured of irq ownership, and > using disable_irq() afterwards is indeed awkward. > Likewise, keen on having this available. Jonathan > Thanks. >