From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425FCC433E6 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F180864E74 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231488AbhBVPb0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:31:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231418AbhBVPbX (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:31:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7686C061794 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:30:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id r3so7875854wro.9 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:30:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=yPjMBhojUCoon9NDnK8Nh4YqsBmKwJwjusKAtHDxYIs=; b=OjNx+KbZDkEk7LQ/ccSS9UrYj0/EXZrMMqVlZW99G0CSZSvk2uZ/ZR3Q9ddUnSebHx 3BBJRkRLE4b30dqs69hAjAm0a/vNAcXDhp8AIF6552Jlfncuu0do0kQ/emuDmL5k7oo0 FQbpcYINidws4EaU1VeXJ6sq2TUyI5HRj+2nr2ZJj/p8zIzOQDcx/69YziNpje27sx8n h4p3UqgA4b1bkJXaqx1WSPLq3WArsUdyJGfbQ+DyW9s/dRORi+HeMaJSHkrDnekZqnV7 oENgEV2hnWNFnbEUREHiuxaj4LulB4CA5x/7arpv70dWDKl3czrC4Nqc9T5LgfUKv5P/ BtZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=yPjMBhojUCoon9NDnK8Nh4YqsBmKwJwjusKAtHDxYIs=; b=ZnJN3fVebkO7niqfy8mtciUxdY1of9k3iOwchmPMCbTOL/qlZ/2Em1mpnOXAcJO3wy 4q2ESBwusnrVyJaEKN7JOMoq9mCjjNRk0SKmahnBcwAl827QK3+VEOPpCbO0eulHS4xq YmCqcS+vVqHdb+qMvSxoXA3dtHgmk+LEF//XgUDtjnZyGuBqnzzeDpu76ScJrxTBOqdH 5gmMUCOKKHCwPK0nldVXLwLkl9gB9F6ZfmkrDKOFH9GPASdxBaVH8/izgmlcO+A0uTXe +mJplmiTFCN1rSBKoU4GjO3oqXvBY2XsFavXCiaP1KYTP0155JfwNY+hGwGqEMxYOW5n UxbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mGe84E1gSSsRLkn3i+FRTp9PPxAAyrKXlb7bSwdsp4Wpd42yR pXmF6UBR85IiuY4r+mqrdq/AHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5IU/i+9v0evRsCf/R2OGTjpriS7h0ZgwtXoJtP5oiyOJQEa8J03FTXvIz25R2t+h9dhymUg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f1c4:: with SMTP id z4mr4413127wro.52.1614007818549; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm28937083wrx.57.2021.02.22.07.30.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:30:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:30:16 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Cristian Ciocaltea Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Dmitry Torokhov , Sebastian Reichel , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Liam Girdwood , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , Linus Walleij , linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add initial support for ATC260x PMICs Message-ID: <20210222153016.GG376568@dell> References: <20210221163602.GA297639@BV030612LT> <20210222090247.GA376568@dell> <20210222151649.GA467803@BV030612LT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210222151649.GA467803@BV030612LT> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:02:47AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > I have just noticed your mfd-next tag for 5.12 doesn't include the > > > support for the ATC260x PMICs. > > > > > > I assumed the patchset is ready for merging.. Did I miss something? > > > > The MFD driver needs another review. > > > > For some reason, this didn't register on my TODO list. > > You have already tagged v6 with 'Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones > ': > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210125142558.GA4903@dell/ > > I have submitted v7 to drop the patches that had been already picked up, > as previously agreed, but otherwise there are no other changes. > > That is why I didn't expect another round of review.. I see what's happened. You forgot to: "apply this as-is to your sign-off block" ... as requested, which made me think it needs a subsequent review. > > In general, if you don't receive a review within ~2 weeks of posting > > (and the merge window is not open), you should consider it lost and > > submit a [RESEND]. Due to the fragility of email reviews, this is still very important. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog