From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A33C433EF for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 05:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231313AbiDVFjh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:39:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54926 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229847AbiDVFZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:25:06 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63FDB4F445; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 59F8D68B05; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:22:08 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] lib/printbuf: New data structure for heap-allocated strings Message-ID: <20220422052208.GA10745@lst.de> References: <20220421234837.3629927-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20220421234837.3629927-7-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20220422042017.GA9946@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 01:14:48AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Christoph, you have no problem making more work for me but I can't even get you I think you are misunderstanding this. You are trying to create more work for people maintainaing the kernel by creating duplicate infrastructure. The burden is always on the submitter. > to look at the bugs you introuduce in your refactorings that I report to you. > > Still waiting on you to look at oops you introduced in bio_copy_data_iter... I'm not sure why I shoud care about your out of tree code making assumptions about block layer helpers.