linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Input: soc_button_array - Add use_low_level_irq module parameter
Date: Sun,  6 Nov 2022 22:53:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221106215320.67109-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)

It seems that the Windows drivers for the ACPI0011 soc_button_array
device use low level triggered IRQs rather then using edge triggering.

Some ACPI tables depend on this, directly poking the GPIO controller's
registers to clear the trigger type when closing a laptop's/2-in-1's lid
and re-instating the trigger when opening the lid again.

Linux sets the edge/level on which to trigger to both low+high since
it is using edge type IRQs, the ACPI tables then ends up also setting
the bit for level IRQs and since both low and high level have been
selected by Linux we get an IRQ storm leading to soft lockups.

As a workaround for this the soc_button_array already contains
a DMI quirk table with device models known to have this issue.

Add a module parameter for this so that users can easily test if their
device is affected too and so that they can use the module parameter
as a workaround.

Cc: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
index 480476121c01..50497dd05027 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
+static bool use_low_level_irq;
+module_param(use_low_level_irq, bool, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_low_level_irq, "Use low-level triggered IRQ instead of edge triggered");
+
 struct soc_button_info {
 	const char *name;
 	int acpi_index;
@@ -164,7 +168,8 @@ soc_button_device_create(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		}
 
 		/* See dmi_use_low_level_irq[] comment */
-		if (!autorepeat && dmi_check_system(dmi_use_low_level_irq)) {
+		if (!autorepeat && (use_low_level_irq ||
+				    dmi_check_system(dmi_use_low_level_irq))) {
 			irq_set_irq_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
 			gpio_keys[n_buttons].irq = irq;
 			gpio_keys[n_buttons].gpio = -ENOENT;
-- 
2.37.3


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-06 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-06 21:53 Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-11-06 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: soc_button_array - Add Acer Switch V 10 to dmi_use_low_level_irq[] Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 19:31   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-07 19:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Input: soc_button_array - Add use_low_level_irq module parameter Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221106215320.67109-1-hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpolzer@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).