From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH HID v1] HID: nvidia-shield: Pack inner/related declarations in HOSTCMD reports
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 23:04:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705060414.581468-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com> (raw)
Match alignment information in composite type declarations used by packed
HOSTCMD report structures. Compiler packing attribute is not recursive for
inner declarations. Mismatched alignment information can cause undefined
behavior in code generated for accessing composite type members. struct
pointers passed to thunderstrike_parse_board_info_payload and
thunderstrike_parse_haptics_payload are an example of this being
potentially problematic since alignment information from the packed HOSTCMD
report is lost.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307041500.6bKn7nCl-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55520#issuecomment-1128617570
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.1.0/gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html#index-packed-type-attribute
Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/hid/hid-nvidia-shield.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-nvidia-shield.c b/drivers/hid/hid-nvidia-shield.c
index 85700cec5eac..a928ad2be62d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-nvidia-shield.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-nvidia-shield.c
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@ static_assert(sizeof(enum thunderstrike_led_state) == 1);
struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_board_info {
__le16 revision;
__le16 serial[7];
-};
+} __packed;
struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_haptics {
u8 motor_left;
u8 motor_right;
-};
+} __packed;
struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_resp_report {
u8 report_id; /* THUNDERSTRIKE_HOSTCMD_RESP_REPORT_ID */
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_resp_report {
__le16 fw_version;
enum thunderstrike_led_state led_state;
u8 payload[30];
- };
+ } __packed;
} __packed;
static_assert(sizeof(struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_resp_report) ==
THUNDERSTRIKE_HOSTCMD_REPORT_SIZE);
@@ -92,15 +92,15 @@ struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_req_report {
u8 reserved_at_10;
union {
- struct {
+ struct __packed {
u8 update;
enum thunderstrike_led_state state;
} led;
- struct {
+ struct __packed {
u8 update;
struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_haptics motors;
} haptics;
- };
+ } __packed;
u8 reserved_at_30[27];
} __packed;
static_assert(sizeof(struct thunderstrike_hostcmd_req_report) ==
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 6:04 Rahul Rameshbabu [this message]
2023-07-10 8:32 ` [PATCH HID v1] HID: nvidia-shield: Pack inner/related declarations in HOSTCMD reports Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230705060414.581468-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--to=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox