linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
To: Marco Morandini <marco.morandini@polimi.it>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: Add introduction about HID for non-kernel programmers
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:15:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230717001544.GA129954@quokka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c2a03ac-cd11-7893-4b89-b88845e0f189@polimi.it>

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Marco Morandini wrote:
> 
> The current version is with a unique code block, and renders like this
> 
> https://home.aero.polimi.it/morandini/Downloads/Screenshot_20230712_185907.png
> 
> With a unique code block but a newline in between the report and the
> explanation I get
> 
> https://home.aero.polimi.it/morandini/Downloads/Screenshot_20230712_190335.png
> 
> that I find somewhat more dispersive.
> 
> If I interpose multiple code blocks and explanations (as text) unfortunately
> spynx add a colon at the end of every paragraph, as if the text was the explanation of the
> code block below, and not above:
> 
> https://home.aero.polimi.it/morandini/Downloads/Screenshot_20230712_190656.png
> 
> I've not understood how to get rid of that colon, and I would prefer to leave the
> explanation _after_ the corresponding code block, and not move it before.

https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html#literal-blocks

This suggests that if you write it as "what follows is a button ::"
(i.e. space before ::) that should render it without a colon.

[...]

> >> +This Report Descriptor tells us that the mouse input will be
> >> +transmitted using four bytes: the first one for the buttons (three
> >> +bits used, five for padding), the last three for the mouse X, Y and
> >> +wheel changes, respectively.
> > 
> > I wonder if here we should mention something like:
> > "This particular device only has one HID report so it may (and does)
> > omit the Report ID. Devices that can send multiple different HID reports
> > must send the Report ID as the first byte of each report."
> 
> The problem is that, with the current document structure,
> Report IDs are introduced later, in section
> "Collections, Report IDs and Evdev events".
> There we have the sentence "A device with only one supporteHID report 
> (like the mouse example above) may omit the report ID."
> 
> Before that section the reader does not know what
> a Report ID is.
> 
> Thus, I could add the sentence you are suggesting, but
> changing it into something like
> 
> This particular device only has one HID report so it may (and does)
> omit the Report ID (see Section "Collections, Report IDs and Evdev events"). 
> Devices that can send multiple different HID reports
> must send the Report ID as the first byte of each report.
> 
> I don't know whether we are clarifying of confusing the matter,
> and I propose to leave things as they are now.

sure, that's fine

Cheers,
  Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-17  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22 20:39 [PATCH v2] HID: Add introduction about HID for non-kernel programmers Marco Morandini
2023-06-23  4:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-23 10:45   ` Marco Morandini
2023-06-23 15:16     ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-27  6:04 ` Peter Hutterer
2023-06-28 13:37   ` Marco Morandini
2023-07-10  2:10     ` Peter Hutterer
2023-07-13 14:36       ` Marco Morandini
2023-07-17  0:15         ` Peter Hutterer [this message]
2023-07-17 16:38           ` Marco Morandini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230717001544.GA129954@quokka \
    --to=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.morandini@polimi.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).