Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: touchscreen: convert neonode,zforce to json-schema

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:52:16 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 08:29:45PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > Convert Neonode infrared touchscreen controller binding to DT schema.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > > ---
> > >  .../input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml     | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../bindings/input/touchscreen/zforce_ts.txt  | 34 ----------
> > >  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/zforce_ts.txt
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..1c45adb2407a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Neonode infrared touchscreen controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@bqreaders.com>  
> > 
> > It;d be good to CC the person you're volunteering! I've done so.
> > 
> well, apparently my get_maintainer.pl | confirm_and_add_addresses | git send-email
> script did not run in the kernel checkout I applied the patch to, so it did
> not catch that address. Sorry.

> BTW: What is common practice for the maintainer address
> in the binding in conversions? Here I looked at the commits of the plaintext binding.

Yeah, that seems reasonable to me.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]