From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] Input: sparcspkr - use cleanup facility for device_node
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 22:43:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010214348.GD4017910@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010-input_automate_of_node_put-v1-6-ebc62138fbf8@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:25:56PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/sparcspkr.c b/drivers/input/misc/sparcspkr.c
> index 20020cbc0752..bb1c732c8f95 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/sparcspkr.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/sparcspkr.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int bbc_beep_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> {
> struct sparcspkr_state *state;
> struct bbc_beep_info *info;
> - struct device_node *dp;
> int err = -ENOMEM;
>
> state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -199,14 +198,13 @@ static int bbc_beep_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> state->event = bbc_spkr_event;
> spin_lock_init(&state->lock);
>
> - dp = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> err = -ENODEV;
> + struct device_node *dp __free(device_node) = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> if (!dp)
> goto out_free;
Sigh... See that
state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!state)
goto out_err;
above?
IOW, this will quietly generate broken code if built with gcc (and refuse to
compile with clang). Yeah, this one is trivially fixed (return -ENOMEM instead
of a goto), but...
__cleanup() can be useful, but it's really *not* safe for blind use; you
need to watch out for changed scopes (harmless in case of device_node)
and for gotos (broken here).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 21:25 [PATCH 00/10] input: automate of_node_put() calls for device_node Javier Carrasco
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] Input: cap11xx - switch to for_each_child_of_node_scoped Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 3:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] Input: mtk-pmic-keys " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] Input: sun4i-lradc-keys " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-11 10:36 ` Andre Przywara
2024-10-20 4:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] Input: twl6040-vibra - use cleanup facility for device_node Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] Input: twl4030-vibra " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] Input: sparcspkr " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-10 21:43 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-10-10 22:01 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-10-10 22:09 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-10-10 22:22 ` Al Viro
2024-10-10 22:28 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] Input: 88pm860x " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] Input: i8042 " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] Input: raspberrypi-ts " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-10-10 21:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] Input: ts4800-ts " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-20 4:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241010214348.GD4017910@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).