From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73C03BBC9; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 06:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743490601; cv=none; b=OKiz4tSCtDJmKSzvmWVTGe1ONRCWaBFXR/glQy0TSD7mf2TCpmhGCl8xe3switHPDSx86e+ETovGulgbRm0cexd7g+/tiKCZIHBS5bKBUrzYwp8KVgLR8nTHW3pxJ7q+0PNBk5e4HIid3Ux2SGu+yexIFvJRJI0fYJf/zNN2Vh8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743490601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GFKxsd0OGuU+pV6q/WYGlQsX3XgcsM/kbJXOW/wuxto=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Spa4DXVQpK3kSMvPawBtCGjqbq0yvTY0MqjohjEcct+WB3ZGPxMIjQkETX0c81T0mgVQENt7THK+C3hTGRS43CZvHYczwG/WAudMSM/aEc9wqD5WD2CXZ85W+YAXqqqdancN0F5NnRWcODZFg0RNmUCCs9BybEz/VqJ9RAkdeZg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=z2VdxEfN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="z2VdxEfN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D03E2C4CEE8; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 06:56:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1743490600; bh=GFKxsd0OGuU+pV6q/WYGlQsX3XgcsM/kbJXOW/wuxto=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=z2VdxEfNTJIvE/HabgSJSvBeMu4NUAIELc43S3sHXIHHv8cDKZ309/WN1crbCrQA9 Qz8OStnhhm5xDZNQ2fcsGbfgQRst8oEmLyZjkAgKTX9I+So2r9h7MeNWnZdcz6tga5 ltKV63S7ixU3vUUNTVG7GGbS3nrdyIU8lyTi1JSM= Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 07:55:13 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Jung Daehwan Cc: Wesley Cheng , Puma Hsu , srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, mathias.nyman@intel.com, perex@perex.cz, conor+dt@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com, tiwai@suse.com, robh@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 01/31] xhci: sideband: add initial api to register a secondary interrupter entity Message-ID: <2025040109-dove-declared-9466@gregkh> References: <20250319005141.312805-1-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com> <20250319005141.312805-2-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com> <2025032734-reward-fantasize-dc16@gregkh> <87746e66-84c1-4ff3-8b69-fbee1664eff6@quicinc.com> <20250401022336.GA98772@ubuntu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250401022336.GA98772@ubuntu> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 11:23:36AM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:12:12AM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > > > On 3/27/2025 3:14 AM, Puma Hsu wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Greg KH wrote: > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:27:00PM +0800, Puma Hsu wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> We have implemented and verified the USB audio offloading feature with > > >>> the xhci sideband driver on our Google Pixel products. We would > > >>> appreciate it if this solution can be accepted. Thank you all for the > > >>> work! > > >>> > > >> > > >> Great, can you properly send a "Tested-by:" line for this against the > > >> 00/XX email so that it will be properly saved? > > >> > > > > > > We(Google Pixel) only use the xhci sideband related changes and two > > > changes in the sound card driver. For the details, what we actually > > > tested are patch [01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12]. > > > Do I still send the "Tested-by:" line to 00/31 email? Or should I just > > > send the "Tested-by:" line to the 8 changes above? (I added > > > "Tested-by" line for this [01/31] first.) > > > > > >> Also, I think a new version of the series is coming, can you test that > > >> to verify it works properly? We have to wait until after -rc1 is out > > >> anyway. > > >> > > > > > > I think this v36 is the last version of the series as I discussed with > > > QCOM Wesley. And for sure I will test it if they do have a new > > > version. > > > > > > > Hi Puma, > > > > I'm discussing with Stephan on the QC specific stuff, so the common changes > > won't change on v37. Please provide your tested-by tags for each commit, > > so I can carry them accordingly on the next submission. If I do end up > > making changes to any of the common patches, I will remove your tested by > > tag, which means you might have to test it again. > > > > Thanks > > Wesley Cheng > > > > > > > > Hi Wesley, > > Thanks for your effort to upstream usb audio offload. > I've also used your patchset like Puma. > ([01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12]) > > It works well on Exynos. Please let me know if you need also > "Tested-by:" on our side. Yes please.