Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: imagis: add missing minItems

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2271 bytes --]

On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 06:12:05PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> The binding currently expects exactly 5 keycodes, which matches the
> chip's theoretical maximum but probably not the number of touch keys on
> any phone using the IST3032C. Add a minItems value of 2 to prevent
> dt-validate complaints.

Does this mean that there are devicetrees in the wild that use < 5
keycodes?

> 
> Also add another example to make sure the linux,keycodes property is
> checked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Duje Mihanović <duje@dujemihanovic.xyz>
> ---
>  .../bindings/input/touchscreen/imagis,ist3038c.yaml    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/imagis,ist3038c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/imagis,ist3038c.yaml
> index bd8ede3a4ad8939cef97e9b177548a8fc8386df7..0ef79343bf9a223501aff8b6a525b873e777ea20 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/imagis,ist3038c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/imagis,ist3038c.yaml
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties:
>  
>    linux,keycodes:
>      description: Keycodes for the touch keys
> +    minItems: 2
>      maxItems: 5
>  
>    touchscreen-size-x: true
> @@ -87,5 +88,22 @@ examples:
>          touchscreen-inverted-y;
>        };
>      };
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    i2c {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +      touchscreen@50 {
> +        compatible = "imagis,ist3032c";
> +        reg = <0x50>;
> +        interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> +        interrupts = <72 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> +        vdd-supply = <&ldo2>;
> +        touchscreen-size-x = <480>;
> +        touchscreen-size-y = <800>;
> +        linux,keycodes = <KEY_APPSELECT>, <KEY_BACK>;

Does this really need a dedicated example? Why can't the property go
into the existing one?

> +      };
> +    };
>  
>  ...
> 
> ---
> base-commit: c17b750b3ad9f45f2b6f7e6f7f4679844244f0b9
> change-id: 20250824-imagis-minitems-4a71387ce61b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Duje Mihanović <duje@dujemihanovic.xyz>
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]