From: Sangyun Kim <sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr>
To: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, bentiss@kernel.org, qasdev00@gmail.com,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] HID: appletb-kbd: fix UAF and mutex-in-atomic in inactivity timer
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:01:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422060104.jbimo4nm6pat3f53@nunu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MAUPR01MB115460F44776CC8E5E5EE7DC4B82F2@MAUPR01MB11546.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 06:17:36 PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
>
>On 4/20/26 10:43, Sangyun Kim wrote:
>>This series addresses two defects in hid-appletb-kbd's inactivity
>>timer subsystem. The two patches target different bugs and are
>>logically independent; they are sent together because they touch the
>>same tear-down code and because the same maintainer will review both.
>>
>>Patch 1 fixes a slab use-after-free with two related tear-down windows
>>introduced by commit 38224c472a03 ("HID: appletb-kbd: fix slab
>>use-after-free bug in appletb_kbd_probe"):
>>
>> A) Within "if (kbd->backlight_dev)" the order was
>> put_device() then timer_delete_sync(). A concurrent
>> hid_appletb_bl unbind between those two calls can drop the last
>> devm reference and free the backlight_device; the still-armed
>> inactivity timer softirq then dereferences the freed object
>> through backlight_device_set_brightness() -> mutex_lock(&ops_lock).
>>
>> B) The "if (kbd->backlight_dev)" block ran before
>> hid_hw_close()/hid_hw_stop(), so even after window A is closed a
>> late ".event" callback from the HID core (USB URB completion on
>> real hardware) can arrive between timer_delete_sync() and
>> put_device(), reach reset_inactivity_timer(), re-arm the timer
>> via mod_timer(), and reopen the same UAF.
>>
>>Both windows produce the same KASAN slab-use-after-free on the object
>>allocated by devm_backlight_device_register(). Patch 1 closes them
>>together by moving hid_hw_close()/hid_hw_stop() before the backlight
>>cleanup and, inside that cleanup block, calling timer_delete_sync()
>>before put_device(). Shipping both as one commit avoids leaving
>>stable kernels in a half-fixed state where only window A is closed.
>>
>>Patch 2 fixes a separate "sleeping function called from invalid
>>context" bug in the same subsystem. The inactivity timer is a
>>struct timer_list, so the callback runs in softirq context and calls
>>backlight_device_set_brightness() -> mutex_lock() from atomic
>>context; reset_inactivity_timer() has the same issue on the
>>brightness-restore path (it is called from appletb_kbd_hid_event()
>>and appletb_kbd_inp_event(), which run in softirq/IRQ context on
>>real USB hardware). Convert the inactivity timer to a delayed_work
>>and defer the brightness-restore call to a dedicated work_struct so
>>both sleeping calls run in process context.
>>
>>Sangyun Kim (2):
>> HID: appletb-kbd: fix UAF in inactivity-timer cleanup path
>> HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues
>>
>> drivers/hid/hid-appletb-kbd.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>
>I had a very weird bug just once. And that was when I pressed fn key,
>upon releasing, the touchbar mode did not restore to normal.
>
>Although it was just once, and I was never able to reproduce it again.
>
>Have you tested it on your Machine btw?
>
>
Hi,
I have not tested this series on actual Apple Touch Bar hardware on my
side, as I do not have access to such a machine locally. All testing on
my side was done under QEMU with a uhid-based setup.
Because of that, I cannot say much about the one-off case where the
Touch Bar did not restore the normal mode after releasing Fn. I have not
been able to reproduce that specific behavior in my setup.
For patch 1, however, I was able to reproduce the teardown UAF in the
uhid/QEMU setup and got the following KASAN report.
[ 56.040407] ==================================================================
[ 56.042444] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timer_base.part.0+0x861/0x910
[ 56.044962] Write of size 8 at addr ffff88801b7e8958 by task swapper/0/0
[ 56.049092] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G N 7.0.0-dirty #2 PREEMPT(full)
[ 56.049967] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 56.050843] Call Trace:
[ 56.051146] <IRQ>
[ 56.052394] __run_timer_base.part.0+0x861/0x910
[ 56.053123] run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190
[ 56.075012] Allocated by task 11:
[ 56.077221] devm_kmalloc+0x70/0x1d0
[ 56.077545] appletb_kbd_probe+0x65/0x470 [hid_appletb_kbd]
[ 56.085606] uhid_device_add_worker+0x3b/0x100
[ 56.088719] Freed by task 11:
[ 56.091296] devres_release_group+0x1fd/0x3d0
[ 56.091844] hid_device_probe+0x4db/0x7d0
[ 56.096916] uhid_device_add_worker+0x3b/0x100
[ 56.123572] backlight_device_set_brightness+0x77/0x280
[ 56.123902] appletb_inactivity_timer+0xe9/0x190 [hid_appletb_kbd]
[ 56.123967] call_timer_fn+0x163/0x4a0
[ 56.124338] __run_timer_base.part.0+0x575/0x910
[ 56.124711] run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190
Patch 2 also matches what I saw in the same setup. On the unpatched
tree, I can reproduce:
[ 56.120488] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:591
[ 56.121118] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
[ 56.123080] __mutex_lock+0xda/0x21c0
[ 56.123572] backlight_device_set_brightness+0x77/0x280
[ 56.123902] appletb_inactivity_timer+0xe9/0x190 [hid_appletb_kbd]
[ 56.124338] __run_timer_base.part.0+0x575/0x910
[ 56.124711] run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190
After applying patch 2, that warning no longer appeared in the timer
reproducer in my uhi/QEMU runs. I also added a small UHID input trigger
to exercise appletb_kbd_hid_event(), and in that setup brightness
restored from 1 back to 2 in 5/5 iterations after the synthetic key
event.
The limitation is that this is still UHID-only coverage. I do not have
native Touch Bar hardware, and pure UHID does not model a real internal
Apple keyboard/trackpad closely enough for me to claim coverage of the
appletb_kbd_inp_event() path or real USB IRQ-context behavior.
Thanks,
Sangyun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 5:13 [PATCH 0/2] HID: appletb-kbd: fix UAF and mutex-in-atomic in inactivity timer Sangyun Kim
2026-04-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] HID: appletb-kbd: fix UAF in inactivity-timer cleanup path Sangyun Kim
2026-04-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues Sangyun Kim
2026-04-20 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] HID: appletb-kbd: fix UAF and mutex-in-atomic in inactivity timer Aditya Garg
2026-04-22 6:01 ` Sangyun Kim [this message]
2026-04-22 9:15 ` Aditya Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260422060104.jbimo4nm6pat3f53@nunu \
--to=sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qasdev00@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox