From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] iio: hid-sensors: drop redundant iio_dev argument
Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 10:42:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260509104205.51481C2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509101040.791404-2-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the removal sequence across HID IIO drivers cancels asynchronous suspend requests, leaving the hardware powered on, which violates PM subsystem guidelines.
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but in `hid-sensor-temperature.c`, the trigger is manually unregistered and freed in the `remove` callback while the IIO device is still active and registered, creating a use-after-free vulnerability.
--
commit 774f02b73d8b538afc5af51312b8682afec55f98
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
iio: hid-sensors: drop redundant iio_dev argument
This commit removes the unused iio_dev argument from
hid_sensor_remove_trigger() across all HID IIO drivers, adapting the
function prototype to simplify the API for a future devm-based conversion.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> index 2ff591b3458f7..a63dae90dadc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void hid_accel_3d_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
> iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> - hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &accel_state->common_attributes);
> + hid_sensor_remove_trigger(&accel_state->common_attributes);
> }
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but could this removal sequence
leave the hardware powered on?
Looking at the removal path across these drivers, iio_device_unregister()
disables the IIO buffers, which eventually calls hid_sensor_power_state()
and queues an asynchronous suspend via pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().
Immediately afterward, hid_sensor_remove_trigger() calls
pm_runtime_disable(). Does calling pm_runtime_disable() immediately after an
async put cancel the pending suspend work, leaving the physical device active
while marking it suspended in the PM core?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
> index 9f628a8e5cfbe..60d4fcc8043b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void hid_temperature_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct temperature_state *temp_st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TEMPERATURE);
> - hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &temp_st->common_attributes);
> + hid_sensor_remove_trigger(&temp_st->common_attributes);
> }
This problem also wasn't introduced by this patch, but is there a
use-after-free risk in this specific driver's removal sequence?
The temperature driver uses devm_iio_device_register() to register the IIO
device, which means the device unregistration is deferred until the devres
cleanup phase after hid_temperature_remove() returns.
However, hid_sensor_remove_trigger() is called manually here and it calls
iio_trigger_free(). Since the IIO device remains fully registered and exposed
to user-space until devres runs, could concurrent sysfs access or buffer
operations dereference the freed trigger pointer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260509101040.791404-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 10:10 [PATCH v3 0/9] iio: introduce devm_ API for hid sensro setup and cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] iio: hid-sensors: drop redundant iio_dev argument Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 10:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-09 21:32 ` David Lechner
2026-05-12 12:37 ` srinivas pandruvada
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] iio: hid-sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 21:35 ` David Lechner
2026-05-12 12:39 ` srinivas pandruvada
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] iio: hid-sensors: introduce device managed API Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-10 6:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-11 16:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-12 12:47 ` srinivas pandruvada
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 21:38 ` David Lechner
2026-05-10 6:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: drop hid_sensor_remove_trigger() using devm API Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: cleanup codestyle check Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: use common device for devres Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 13:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10 6:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-11 16:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: use local struct device Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: drop hid_sensor_remove_trigger() using devm API Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-09 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] iio: introduce devm_ API for hid sensro setup and cleanup David Lechner
2026-05-14 2:47 ` Zhang, Lixu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260509104205.51481C2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox