From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Manish Khadka" <maskmemanish@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: letsketch: fix UAF on inrange_timer at driver unbind
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:58:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515155838.B4247C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515153551.76162-1-maskmemanish@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing timer cleanup on the probe error path leads to a Use-After-Free.
- [Medium] Unnecessary spinlock and state flag introduced instead of using `timer_shutdown_sync()`.
--
commit 2d88d7acbcf7e811559cfcb0df7e33f55178711b
Author: Manish Khadka <maskmemanish@gmail.com>
HID: letsketch: fix UAF on inrange_timer at driver unbind
This commit adds a remove callback to the letsketch driver to clean up
the inrange_timer during device unbind. It introduces a spinlock and a
removing flag to prevent the timer from being re-armed by in-flight
events while teardown is occurring.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-letsketch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-letsketch.c
> index 11e21f9887232..0dc9496d05f80 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-letsketch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-letsketch.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -305,6 +315,23 @@ static int letsketch_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *
> return hid_hw_start(hdev, HID_CONNECT_HIDRAW);
> }
While not introduced by this patch, if hid_hw_start() fails and returns an
error, does this leave a pending timer that will fire on freed memory?
Looking at hid_hw_start(), it enables hardware I/O before attempting to
connect. If the connection fails, it stops I/O and returns an error:
hid_hw_start() {
hdev->ll_driver->start(hdev);
if (hid_connect(hdev, connect_mask)) {
hdev->ll_driver->stop(hdev);
return error;
}
}
During the window where I/O is active, an incoming event could trigger
letsketch_raw_event() and arm the timer.
When letsketch_probe() directly returns this error, devres immediately frees
the letsketch_data structure without draining the timer.
> +static void letsketch_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
> +{
> + struct letsketch_data *data = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +
> + /*
> + * Block raw_event from arming inrange_timer during teardown so
> + * timer_delete_sync() below cannot race with a fresh mod_timer()
> + * issued from a URB completion handler still in flight while
> + * hid_hw_stop() is running.
> + */
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &data->lock)
> + data->removing = true;
> +
> + timer_delete_sync(&data->inrange_timer);
> + hid_hw_stop(hdev);
> +}
Could this synchronization be achieved without adding a new spinlock and state
flag by using timer_shutdown_sync() instead?
The timer_shutdown_sync() API permanently disables the timer, ensuring that
any subsequent mod_timer() calls are silent no-ops.
Alternatively, if hid_hw_stop() were called before cleaning up the timer, it
would wait for all URBs to complete, which structurally guarantees no new
events can arrive to re-arm the timer.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260515153551.76162-1-maskmemanish@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 15:35 [PATCH] HID: letsketch: fix UAF on inrange_timer at driver unbind Manish Khadka
2026-05-15 15:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-15 16:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Manish Khadka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515155838.B4247C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maskmemanish@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox