From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jinmo Yang" <jinmo44.yang@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: wacom: validate report length for PL and PTU handlers
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 14:22:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517142244.A8CA4C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517135215.2220117-2-jinmo44.yang@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incomplete Fix / Unhandled OOB Reads for Multiple Device Types
--
commit 4ac677c30d7590ff24c2b6674eafbe8d0fff6898
Author: Jinmo Yang <jinmo44.yang@gmail.com>
HID: wacom: validate report length for PL and PTU handlers
This commit adds minimum length checks before dispatching HID reports to
the PL and PTU handlers. This prevents slab-out-of-bounds reads when a
malicious device sends an artificially small report.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> index da1f0ea85625d..6d06842b64080 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> @@ -3453,6 +3453,8 @@ void wacom_wac_irq(struct wacom_wac *wacom_wac, size_t len)
> break;
>
> case PL:
> + if (len < 8)
> + return;
> sync = wacom_pl_irq(wacom_wac);
> break;
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -3464,6 +3466,8 @@ void wacom_wac_irq(struct wacom_wac *wacom_wac, size_t len)
> break;
>
> case PTU:
> + if (len < 8)
> + return;
> sync = wacom_ptu_irq(wacom_wac);
> break;
>
While this successfully prevents out-of-bounds reads for PL and PTU devices,
do other handlers called from wacom_wac_irq() remain vulnerable to the same
issue?
For example, wacom_graphire_irq() unconditionally accesses data[8] for
WACOM_MO:
wacom_wac_irq()
wacom_graphire_irq()
case WACOM_MO:
prox = (data[7] & 0xf8) || data[8];
Similarly, wacom_remote_irq() ignores its len argument and accesses up to
data[12], and wacom_intuos_pro2_bt_battery() can access data[284].
If a device spoofing these other types sends an undersized report, could it
bypass the checks added here and still trigger a slab-out-of-bounds read?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517135215.2220117-1-jinmo44.yang@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 13:52 [PATCH 0/4] HID: wacom: add report length validation in irq handlers Jinmo Yang
2026-05-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] HID: wacom: validate report length for PL and PTU handlers Jinmo Yang
2026-05-17 14:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] HID: wacom: validate report length for DTU handler Jinmo Yang
2026-05-17 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] HID: wacom: validate report length for DTUS handler Jinmo Yang
2026-05-17 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] HID: wacom: validate report length for 24HDT and 27QHDT handlers Jinmo Yang
2026-05-17 15:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517142244.A8CA4C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jinmo44.yang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox