From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Natália Salvino André" <natalia.andre@ime.usp.br>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] iio: gyro: HID: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: Refactor channel initialization
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 00:31:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520003112.6F9A51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519234752.23911-3-natalia.andre@ime.usp.br>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] The `struct iio_scan_type` is incorrectly initialized with a non-existent `.format` member, causing a build failure.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but a teardown race condition exists when the driver is unbound, leading to a potential Use-After-Free of `gyro_state` inside the HID raw event handler.
--
commit fa4886d3bbba316658546fb6162186593b204b9c
Author: Natália Salvino André <natalia.andre@ime.usp.br>
iio: gyro: HID: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: Refactor channel initialization
This commit replaces the local gyro_3d_adjust_channel_bit_mask() function
with a compound literal for scan_type initialization to improve code
readability. It also cleans up the channel initialization loop by iterating
directly over the channel scan indices.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c b/drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c
> index c43990c518f77..ee7bde8620b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -248,19 +238,20 @@ static int gyro_3d_parse_report(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct gyro_3d_state *st)
> {
> int ret;
> - int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i <= CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_Z; ++i) {
> + for (unsigned int ch = CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X; ch <= CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_Z; ch++) {
> ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(hsdev,
> HID_INPUT_REPORT,
> usage_id,
> - HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ANGL_VELOCITY_X_AXIS + i,
> - &st->gyro[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X + i]);
> + HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ANGL_VELOCITY_X_AXIS + ch,
> + &st->gyro[ch]);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> - gyro_3d_adjust_channel_bit_mask(channels,
> - CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X + i,
> - st->gyro[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X + i].size);
> + channels[ch].scan_type = (struct iio_scan_type) {
> + .format = 's',
[Severity: Low]
Does this initialization cause a build failure?
Looking at struct iio_scan_type, it designates the field for signedness as sign,
not format. The original code correctly assigned 's' to
channels[channel].scan_type.sign. Using format here will likely cause a compiler
error about having no member named format.
> + .realbits = BYTES_TO_BITS(st->gyro[ch].size),
> + .storagebits = BITS_PER_TYPE(u32),
> + };
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could a teardown race condition
exist when the driver is unbound, leading to a potential use-after-free of
gyro_state inside the HID raw event handler?
When the driver is manually unbound, hid_gyro_3d_remove() calls
sensor_hub_remove_callback(). This core function unregisters the callback list
entry but does not flush or synchronize with concurrently running
sensor_hub_raw_event() asynchronous dispatches.
Consequently, remove completes and devres proceeds to free indio_dev, which
embeds gyro_state and the callback structure. A concurrent
sensor_hub_raw_event() that fetched the callback pointer prior to removal (after
dropping dyn_callback_lock) could then execute callback->capture_sample() and
callback->send_event() on freed memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519234752.23911-1-natalia.andre@ime.usp.br?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 23:40 [PATCH v4 0/6] iio: hid-sensor: standardize scan_type initialization Natália Salvino André
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] iio: accel: HID: hid-sensor-accel-3d: Refactor channel initialization Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 0:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] iio: gyro: HID: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: " Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] iio: light: HID: hid-sensor-als: " Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] iio: light: HID: hid-sensor-prox: " Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 0:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] iio: magnetometer: HID: hid-sensor-magn-3d: " Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 1:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 23:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] iio: pressure: HID: hid-sensor-press: " Natália Salvino André
2026-05-20 1:14 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520003112.6F9A51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natalia.andre@ime.usp.br \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox