From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Svyatoslav Ryhel" <clamor95@gmail.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 19:28:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520192819.629261F00894@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520182124.117863-6-clamor95@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Modifying the OF match table breaks backward compatibility with existing Device Trees.
- [Low] Casting a pointer directly to an enum causes a `-Wpointer-to-int-cast` compiler warning on 64-bit architectures.
--
commit d4fffaca1e4a78c4406875cbdeef7c59b0fe0b1a
Author: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board
This commit introduces board-specific subdevice configurations for the
Motorola CPCAP MFD. It defines common, default, and mapphone device lists
and uses SPI/OF match data to select the variant.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> index d8243b956f875..5b6ca6b81c232 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -241,62 +229,58 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
[ ... ]
> static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap;
> + const struct mfd_cell *cells;
> + unsigned int num_cells;
> int ret;
>
> cpcap = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*cpcap), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cpcap)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + cpcap->variant = (enum cpcap_variant)spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
[Severity: Low]
Does this direct cast from a pointer to an enum cause a compiler warning on
64-bit architectures?
spi_get_device_match_data() returns a const void *, which is 64-bit on
64-bit architectures, while enum cpcap_variant is typically a 32-bit integer.
Casting directly from a 64-bit pointer to a 32-bit enum can trigger a
-Wpointer-to-int-cast warning and cause build failures when compiled with
-Werror.
Should the pointer be cast to an intermediate integer type like
(uintptr_t) or (unsigned long) first?
[ ... ]
> @@ -331,10 +315,29 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
[ ... ]
> +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", .data = (void *)CPCAP_DEFAULT },
> + { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap", .data = (void *)CPCAP_MAPPHONE },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
[Severity: Critical]
Does this modification to the OF match table break backward compatibility with
existing Device Trees?
The Device Tree is considered a stable ABI in the kernel. This change reassigns
the existing "motorola,cpcap" compatible string to map to CPCAP_DEFAULT instead
of preserving its legacy behavior (which included Mapphone-specific child
nodes).
Older DTBs rely on "motorola,cpcap" to instantiate devices such as the battery
charger and Mapphone-specific ADC/regulator/USB-PHY. By mapping to
CPCAP_DEFAULT, the MFD core uses generic compatible strings (e.g.,
"motorola,cpcap-adc" instead of "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc") and entirely
omits the charger. As a result, the child devices fail to match their DT nodes,
leaving them without of_node pointers and breaking critical functionality.
Additionally, could the complete removal of the "st,6556002" compatible string
(mentioned in the commit message) break devices relying on it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260520182124.117863-1-clamor95@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/6] mfd: cpcap: convert documentation to schema and add Mot board support Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 20:13 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] dt-bindings: input: cpcap-pwrbutton: " Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 20:13 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: " Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 18:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-05-20 19:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-20 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition Svyatoslav Ryhel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520192819.629261F00894@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=clamor95@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox