From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix firmware leak in async update
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 05:37:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260523053744.07CA71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260523050634.501509-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Mixing `goto`-based error handling with scope-based cleanup (`__free`) violates subsystem guidelines and alters cleanup ordering.
--
commit f3d6f89d29ebee4b433ceb5d40e22c091317e635
Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Input: ims-pcu - fix firmware leak in async update
This commit changes the async firmware update routine to use scope-based
cleanup for the firmware object. This ensures the firmware is released
if validation fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/ims-pcu.c b/drivers/input/misc/ims-pcu.c
> index 5d1df07ac2a2a..e6603aaf7b303 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/ims-pcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/ims-pcu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -934,9 +934,10 @@ static int ims_pcu_handle_firmware_update(struct ims_pcu *pcu,
> -static void ims_pcu_process_async_firmware(const struct firmware *fw,
> +static void ims_pcu_process_async_firmware(const struct firmware *_fw,
> void *context)
> {
> + const struct firmware *fw __free(firmware) = _fw;
> struct ims_pcu *pcu = context;
> int error;
[ ... ]
> @@ -956,8 +957,6 @@ static void ims_pcu_process_async_firmware(const struct firmware *fw,
> scoped_guard(mutex, &pcu->cmd_mutex)
> ims_pcu_handle_firmware_update(pcu, fw);
>
> - release_firmware(fw);
> -
> out:
> complete(&pcu->async_firmware_done);
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does mixing goto with __free() in this function alter the intended cleanup
order and cause a regression?
Because scope-based cleanup handlers execute at the end of the variable's
scope (which is after the out label), release_firmware() will now run after
complete() rather than before it.
The cleanup guidelines also note that for a given routine, we should avoid
mixing goto and __free(), and instead convert all resources to scope-based
cleanup or convert none of them.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260523050634.501509-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-23 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-23 5:06 [PATCH 01/11] Input: ims-pcu - release data interface on disconnect Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix use-after-free and double-free in disconnect Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix type confusion in CDC union descriptor parsing Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix firmware leak in async update Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:37 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix race condition in reset_device sysfs callback Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] Input: ims-pcu - validate control endpoint type Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix logic error in packet reset Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 6:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix out-of-bounds read in ims_pcu_irq() debug logging Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix DMA mapping violation in line setup Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] Input: ims-pcu - add response length checks Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] Input: ims-pcu - fix potential infinite loop in CDC union descriptor parsing Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-23 6:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-23 5:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] Input: ims-pcu - release data interface on disconnect sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260523053744.07CA71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox