From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Myeonghun Pak" <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: wacom: stop hardware after post-start probe failures
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 18:41:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260524184111.1648B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260524175552.1973-1-mhun512@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The error path in `wacom_parse_and_register()` fails to cancel asynchronous works and timers, leading to a Use-After-Free when the `wacom` structure is freed.
- [High] Dismantling software state before the hardware is stopped on failure paths creates race conditions with active interrupt handlers, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Releasing driver resources before stopping HID hardware in `wacom_wireless_work()` leads to a Use-After-Free on incoming events.
--
commit 6396bf377f7e81b67088a1a9500d030c3776a230
Author: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
HID: wacom: stop hardware after post-start probe failures
This commit modifies wacom_parse_and_register() to route post-hid_hw_start()
failures through hid_hw_stop() before releasing driver resources.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> index a32320b351e3e..76dc833f5f2e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2456,16 +2456,16 @@ static int wacom_parse_and_register(struct wacom *wacom, bool wireless)
>
> error = wacom_register_inputs(wacom);
> if (error)
> - goto fail;
> + goto fail_hw_stop;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does setting the input pointers to NULL
before stopping the hardware create a race condition?
When wacom_register_inputs() fails, its error path sets wacom_wac->pad_input
to NULL. However, because hid_hw_stop() hasn't been called yet, the
hardware can still generate interrupts:
wacom_parse_and_register()
wacom_register_inputs()
fail:
wacom_wac->pad_input = NULL;
return error;
goto fail_hw_stop;
If an interrupt arrives before hid_hw_stop() completes, will the interrupt
handler dereference the NULL pad_input pointer?
>
> if (wacom->wacom_wac.features.device_type & WACOM_DEVICETYPE_PAD) {
> error = wacom_initialize_leds(wacom);
> if (error)
> - goto fail;
> + goto fail_hw_stop;
>
> error = wacom_initialize_remotes(wacom);
> if (error)
> - goto fail;
> + goto fail_hw_stop;
> }
>
> if (!wireless) {
[ ... ]
> @@ -2496,6 +2496,7 @@ static int wacom_parse_and_register(struct wacom *wacom, bool wireless)
> return 0;
>
> fail_quirks:
> +fail_hw_stop:
> hid_hw_stop(hdev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path leave pending
asynchronous works and timers running?
While hid_hw_stop() stops new interrupts from the hardware, works like
wireless_work, battery_work, remote_work, or timers that were already
scheduled while the hardware was active might still be pending.
Because wacom_probe() will propagate this error and trigger devres cleanup
to free the wacom structure, could these pending works execute later and
attempt to dereference the freed wacom pointer?
> fail:
> wacom_release_resources(wacom);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does releasing resources before
stopping the hardware in other code paths create a similar race
condition?
For example, in wacom_wireless_work(), wacom_release_resources() is
called before stopping the HID hardware. This frees resources like
pen_fifo via devres_release_group().
If an incoming HID report arrives after devres_release_group() but
before the hardware is stopped, could wacom_raw_event() attempt to
push data to the freed pen_fifo via wacom_wac_queue_insert(), causing
a use-after-free?
> return error;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260524175552.1973-1-mhun512@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-24 17:53 [PATCH] HID: wacom: stop hardware after post-start probe failures Myeonghun Pak
2026-05-24 18:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260524184111.1648B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox