From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 19:33:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603193333.884B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603192415.6679-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Requesting a shared IRQ before the serio port is fully allocated and initialized leads to a potential NULL pointer dereference or uninitialized spinlock access in the interrupt handler.
- [High] Mixing `devm` managed interrupts with manual resource unregistration causes an incorrect teardown order, leading to a use-after-free if a shared interrupt fires during device removal.
--
commit d306647eec008111ed14c378d300aa2cb98191b6
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval
Simplify resource mapping by using devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
instead of the longer devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() helper
as the last argument is NULL.
Additionally, use platform_get_irq() to retrieve the interrupt
instead of irq_of_parse_and_map() and propagate its error code on
failure. irq_of_parse_and_map() requires irq_dispose_mapping, which is
missing.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c b/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
> index 0aa4ab00af352..5f21acdd41139 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ static int apbps2_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> iowrite32be(0, &priv->regs->ctrl);
>
> /* IRQ */
> - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> + irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> err = devm_request_irq(&ofdev->dev, irq, apbps2_isr,
> IRQF_SHARED, "apbps2", priv);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but requesting a shared IRQ here before the
serio port is fully allocated and initialized creates a window for a NULL
pointer dereference.
If a shared interrupt fires immediately (triggered by another device on the
same line) and there is leftover data in the PS/2 FIFO, apbps2_isr() will
execute:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_isr() {
...
serio_interrupt(priv->io, data, rxflags);
...
}
Since priv->io is either NULL or not fully initialized until later in probe:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_of_probe() {
...
priv->io = ... /* allocated later */
...
}
Could this lead to a crash if the ISR fires early?
[Severity: High]
This is another pre-existing issue, but does mixing a devm-managed interrupt
here with manual unregistration in apbps2_of_remove() cause a teardown order
issue?
In apbps2_of_remove(), the driver manually unregisters and frees the serio
port:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_of_remove() {
...
serio_unregister_port(priv->io);
...
}
Because the interrupt was requested with devm_request_irq(), its handler
remains active until devres runs free_irq() after apbps2_of_remove() returns.
If a shared interrupt fires during this window and there is pending data,
apbps2_isr() will execute and pass the already-freed priv->io pointer to
serio_interrupt(), resulting in a use-after-free.
Could the interrupt teardown order be adjusted to prevent this race?
> if (err) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603192415.6679-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 19:24 [PATCH] Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval Rosen Penev
2026-06-03 19:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603193333.884B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox