Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joy Zou" <joy.zou@nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Input: snvs_pwrkey - report press event in interrupt handler
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 09:07:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604090716.838A11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604-pwrkey-cleanup-v2-4-59fa0ddf0d7c@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Data race between hardirq and timer softirq leads to desynchronized key state
--

commit 9a729213fc1cfc21c866a352fad1a978bfa80359
Author: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>

Input: snvs_pwrkey - report press event in interrupt handler

This commit modifies the snvs_pwrkey driver to directly report key press
events from the interrupt handler during system suspend. This bypasses the
debounce timer to prevent event loss during the no_irq resume phase.

> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> index 4a1d048984826..f212a6b26185d 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -92,6 +93,15 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  			input_sync(input);
>  			pm_relax(input->dev.parent);
>  		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Report key press events directly in interrupt handler to prevent event
> +			 * loss during system suspend.
> +			 */
> +			if (pdata->suspended) {
> +				pdata->keystate = 1;
> +				input_report_key(input, pdata->keycode, 1);
> +				input_sync(input);
> +			}

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a data race with the timer callback
imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events()?

The new hardirq logic writes to pdata->keystate locklessly here, but
imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events() also reads and writes it locklessly in
softirq context.

Could this sequence occur:

1. The timer callback reads state = 0 (key released) and evaluates
   (state ^ pdata->keystate) as true.
2. The timer sets pdata->keystate = 0.
3. Before the timer calls input_event(), a key press triggers the hardirq
   on the same CPU (preemption) or another CPU.
4. The hardirq sees pdata->suspended == true, sets pdata->keystate = 1,
   and reports a key press (1).
5. The timer resumes and reports the release (0) to the input core.

This would leave pdata->keystate as 1, while the input subsystem's last
reported state is 0. On the next physical key press, the timer would read
state = 1, evaluate 1 ^ 1 as 0, and ignore the event. This might cause the
power key to become logically stuck until physically released again.

>  			mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer,
>  			          jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME));
>  		}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604-pwrkey-cleanup-v2-0-59fa0ddf0d7c@nxp.com?part=4

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04  6:56 [PATCH v2 0/4] snvs_pwrkey - code improvements and add report event Joy Zou
2026-06-04  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Input: snvs_pwrkey - make use of dev_err_probe() Joy Zou
2026-06-04  7:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Input: snvs_pwrkey - replace hardcoding -EINVAL with original error code Joy Zou
2026-06-04  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Input: snvs_pwrkey - use local device pointer to simple code Joy Zou
2026-06-04  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Input: snvs_pwrkey - report press event in interrupt handler Joy Zou
2026-06-04  9:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604090716.838A11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joy.zou@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox