Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: use u32 instead of unsigned
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 12:27:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260606122710.6106B1F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260606-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v1-4-dd4a6820b674@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Direct casting of the raw HID byte stream pointer (`raw_data`) to `u16 *` and `u32 *` causes unaligned memory accesses and misinterprets little-endian HID data on big-endian architectures.
--

commit e810e65c50acb8fcba7f1cd54ed67e25dac1f409
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: use u32 instead of unsigned

This patch updates the usage_id parameter to use u32 instead of a bare
unsigned type. This improves code clarity and consistency with standard
kernel style.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
> index edc9274a2c076..9059f00f0cedf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int prox_proc_event(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>  
>  /* Capture samples in local storage */
>  static int prox_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> -				unsigned usage_id,
> +				u32 usage_id,
>  				size_t raw_len, char *raw_data,
>  				void *priv)
>  {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since you are updating types in this
function, could we also address how the raw_data pointer is accessed?

Further down in prox_capture_sample(), the raw HID byte stream is directly
cast to u16 and u32 pointers:

	switch (raw_len) {
	case 1:
		prox_state->human_presence[chan] = *(u8 *)raw_data * multiplier;
		return 0;
	case 2:
		prox_state->human_presence[chan] = *(u16 *)raw_data * multiplier;
		return 0;
	case 4:
		prox_state->human_presence[chan] = *(u32 *)raw_data * multiplier;
		return 0;
	}

Can this sequence cause unaligned memory accesses or endianness issues?

Because HID fields are tightly packed and can have arbitrary lengths, the
raw_data pointer is not guaranteed to be 2-byte or 4-byte aligned.
Dereferencing it directly could trigger unaligned access traps on
architectures that do not natively support them.

Additionally, HID reports are transmitted in little-endian format over the
wire. Reading them via a direct cast evaluates them in host byte-order,
which could yield corrupted data on big-endian architectures.

Would it be better to use get_unaligned_le16() and get_unaligned_le32()
here to safely extract the payload?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260606-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v1-0-dd4a6820b674@gmail.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-06 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-06 12:17 [PATCH 0/7] HID: iio: basic clean up for usage_id Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:27   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 6/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:17 ` [PATCH 7/7] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-06 12:32   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260606122710.6106B1F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox