From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Heitor Alves de Siqueira" <halves@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hiddev: Use kref to track struct hiddev lifetime
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:52:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608165248.59F0B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608-hiddev_kref-v1-1-cd240c95423f@igalia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Use-After-Free in hiddev_send_event due to race between hid_disconnect and usbhid_irq_in.
--
commit a4056f7ab6df2200de09a38f314eabfb8dd4a066
Author: Heitor Alves de Siqueira <halves@igalia.com>
HID: hiddev: Use kref to track struct hiddev lifetime
This commit fixes a race between hiddev_disconnect() and hiddev_release()
by introducing a kref in struct hiddev. It moves the deallocation into a
dedicated release callback, ensuring the structure is only freed after both
functions are complete.
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=563191a4939ddbfe73d4
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c
> index 6378801b22c6d..1f2802920beee 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -933,13 +947,11 @@ void hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *hid)
>
> mutex_lock(&hiddev->existancelock);
> hiddev->exist = 0;
> -
> if (hiddev->open) {
> hid_hw_close(hiddev->hid);
> wake_up_interruptible(&hiddev->wait);
> - mutex_unlock(&hiddev->existancelock);
> - } else {
> - mutex_unlock(&hiddev->existancelock);
> - kfree(hiddev);
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&hiddev->existancelock);
> +
> + kref_put(&hiddev->kref, hiddev_kref_free);
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a use-after-free
race condition when freeing struct hiddev while URBs are still active?
When a USB HID device is disconnected, usbhid_disconnect() eventually calls
hid_hw_stop(), which tears down the high-level structures before stopping
the low-level driver:
drivers/hid/hid-core.c:hid_hw_stop() {
hid_disconnect(hdev);
hdev->ll_driver->stop(hdev);
}
Because hid_disconnect() calls hiddev_disconnect() (which drops the kref
here), if no userspace process holds the file open, struct hiddev will be
freed immediately.
Since the input URBs have not yet been killed by hdev->ll_driver->stop(),
can an URB complete concurrently on another CPU?
If the URB completes, the completion handler usbhid_irq_in() propagates to
hid_input_report() -> hid_input_field() -> hiddev_send_event(), which then
dereferences the freed hiddev pointer:
drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:hiddev_send_event() {
struct hiddev *hiddev = hid->hiddev;
struct hiddev_list *list;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&hiddev->list_lock, flags);
Would this cause a use-after-free panic in interrupt context when it tries
to acquire list_lock?
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608-hiddev_kref-v1-1-cd240c95423f@igalia.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 16:33 [PATCH] HID: hiddev: Use kref to track struct hiddev lifetime Heitor Alves de Siqueira
2026-06-08 16:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 18:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608165248.59F0B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=halves@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox