Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jun Yan" <jerrysteve1101@gmail.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Add CAP1114 support
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 07:35:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612073537.0C9ED1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612072237.1177304-9-jerrysteve1101@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Schema constraint conflict for `linux,keycodes` makes CAP1114 validation impossible.
- [High] Buffer overflow when parsing `microchip,calib-sensitivity` property for models with >8 channels.
--

commit f0d8405d987f3f3e2623cf6af9274da6bb531e55
Author: Jun Yan <jerrysteve1101@gmail.com>

    dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Add CAP1114 support
    
    CAP1114 is a 14-channel capacitive touch sensor with 11 LED outputs
    and hardware reset support. Add the compatible string for CAP1114,
    update maximum LED channels, and add constraints for linux,keycodes.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/microchip,cap11xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/microchip,cap11xx.yaml
> index 778ec6d659a8d..0e9a1a8a3f3e7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/microchip,cap11xx.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/microchip,cap11xx.yaml

[ ... ]

> @@ -178,6 +182,18 @@ allOf:
>        properties:
>          reset-gpios: false
>  
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - microchip,cap1114
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        linux,keycodes:
> +          minItems: 14
> +          maxItems: 14
> +

[Severity: High]
This conditional block enforces 14 items for linux,keycodes, but earlier in
the file there is a global constraint that limits it to 8:

  linux,keycodes:
    minItems: 3
    maxItems: 8

Because JSON Schema evaluates global and conditional constraints cumulatively,
any valid CAP1114 node with 14 keycodes will fail dt_binding_check against
the global 8-item limit. Should the global maxItems be increased to 14,
while keeping other models constrained in their respective blocks?

[ ... ]

One additional question regarding the CAP1114 integration with the driver:

[Severity: High]
When CAP1114 support is added to the driver (since num_channels will be 14),
can this lead to an out-of-bounds write?

In drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c, calib_sensitivities is a fixed-size
8-element array:

	struct cap11xx_priv {
		...
		u32 calib_sensitivities[8];
		u32 keycodes[];
	};

However, during initialization, the driver reads num_channels items into it:

	if (!of_property_read_u32_array(node, "microchip,calib-sensitivity",
					priv->calib_sensitivities,
					priv->model->num_channels)) {

Even though the CAP1114 binding forbids microchip,calib-sensitivity, an
incorrectly configured or malicious device tree providing 14 items could
cause this to overflow the 8-element array by 24 bytes. Does the driver
need to be updated to prevent this when num_channels is greater than 8?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612072237.1177304-1-jerrysteve1101@gmail.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12  7:22 [PATCH v2 0/9] Input: cap11xx - Add support for CAP1114 Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] Input: cap11xx - clean up duplicate log and add probe error logs Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] Input: cap11xx - remove unused register macros Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Update datasheet URL and LED reg range Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Add microchip,cap1126 LED reg constraints Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Add reset-gpios property Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] Input: cap11xx - add reset gpio support Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] Input: cap11xx - refactor code for better CAP1114 support Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] dt-bindings: input: microchip,cap11xx: Add " Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:35   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12  7:22 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] Input: cap11xx - add support for CAP1114 Jun Yan
2026-06-12  7:42   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612073537.0C9ED1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jerrysteve1101@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox