From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay"
<devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: mms114 - reject an oversized device packet size
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 04:31:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260613043110.1DC8E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612-b4-disp-dc4b8dc4-v1-1-d7cb0a828d92@proton.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Stack out-of-bounds read and severe struct misalignment when parsing MMS136/MMS134S touch events, leading to a kernel memory information leak.
--
commit 2622e1ec203d4e3a475cf8bb039715b16ecc29d8
Author: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Input: mms114 - reject an oversized device packet size
This commit adds a bounds check to reject packet sizes from the device that
exceed the size of the local touch array. This prevents a stack out-of-bounds
write caused by a malfunctioning or malicious device.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/mms114.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/mms114.c
> index af462086a65ca..4c75f16c503dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/mms114.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/mms114.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,13 @@ static irqreturn_t mms114_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> if (packet_size <= 0)
> goto out;
>
> + /* the device controls packet_size; reject anything too big for touch[] */
> + if (packet_size > (int)sizeof(touch)) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Invalid packet size %d (max %zu)\n",
> + packet_size, sizeof(touch));
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> /* MMS136 has slightly different event size */
> if (data->type == TYPE_MMS134S || data->type == TYPE_MMS136)
> touch_size = packet_size / MMS136_EVENT_SIZE;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this calculation cause an out-of-bounds
read and structure misalignment later in the function?
If packet_size is up to 80 (the maximum allowed by the newly added bounds
check), touch_size for MMS136 and MMS134S devices will be 80 / 6 = 13.
In the loop further down in mms114_interrupt():
for (index = 0; index < touch_size; index++) {
switch (touch[index].type) {
When index reaches 12, touch[12] reads 8 bytes starting from offset 96,
because sizeof(struct mms114_touch) is 8 bytes. Since the touch array is only
80 bytes long, wouldn't this read past the end of the stack buffer?
Also, since the hardware sends contiguous 6-byte events but they are iterated
using an 8-byte array step, does this misalign the parsing for every event
after the first one?
This misaligned and out-of-bounds stack data is then processed in
mms114_process_mt(), where touch->width and touch->strength are passed to
input_report_abs(). Could this inadvertently leak uninitialized stack memory to
userspace?
> else
> touch_size = packet_size / MMS114_EVENT_SIZE;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612-b4-disp-dc4b8dc4-v1-1-d7cb0a828d92@proton.me?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-13 4:21 [PATCH] Input: mms114 - reject an oversized device packet size Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-13 4:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260613043110.1DC8E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox