Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay"
	<devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F30 keymap to the GPIO/LED count
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 05:50:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260614055001.B3D6D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614-b4-disp-818d6bda-v1-2-cf39a3615085@proton.me>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unbinding the `rmi4_f30` driver leaves a dangling pointer in the shared input device's `keycode` field, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--

commit 251790cc33b0da19e8d0320efecb822396ad7b5f
Author: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>

Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F30 keymap to the GPIO/LED count

This commit fixes an out-of-bounds read and write issue in the F30
keymap handler. It allocates the keymap based on the full reported
GPIO/LED count rather than capping the allocation at 6 entries.

> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f30.c
> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int rmi_f30_map_gpios(struct rmi_function *fn,
>  	int button_count = min_t(u8, f30->gpioled_count, TRACKSTICK_RANGE_END);
>  
>  	f30->gpioled_key_map = devm_kcalloc(&fn->dev,
> -					    button_count,
> +					    f30->gpioled_count,
>  					    sizeof(f30->gpioled_key_map[0]),
>  					    GFP_KERNEL);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are modifying this allocation,
can this lead to a use-after-free when the driver is unbound?

The memory for f30->gpioled_key_map is managed by the function subdevice
using fn->dev. Later in rmi_f30_map_gpios(), this pointer is assigned to the
shared input device's keycode field:

input->keycode = f30->gpioled_key_map;

Since the shared input device is attached to the parent RMI device, it can
outlive the function subdevice. If userspace unbinds the rmi4_f30 driver
via sysfs (because the driver lacks a remove callback and does not set
suppress_bind_attrs), devres will free f30->gpioled_key_map while
the input device remains registered.

Would a subsequent ioctl like EVIOCGKEYCODE or EVIOCSKEYCODE access this
freed input->keycode memory?

Does this also cause a race condition during device unplug, since the
function devices are unbound before the input device is unregistered?

>  	if (!f30->gpioled_key_map) {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260614-b4-disp-818d6bda-v1-0-cf39a3615085@proton.me?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-14  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-14  5:36 [PATCH 0/2] (no cover subject) Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14  5:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F3A keymap to the GPIO count Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14  5:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14  5:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F30 keymap to the GPIO/LED count Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14  5:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260614055001.B3D6D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox