Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: goodix - clamp the device-reported contact count
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:42:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615184204.26707-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ai8WppWIAsSKXwFk@google.com>

On Sun, Jun 14, 2026 at 02:02:27PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Should we drop the report if is has bogus data in it?

We already do, for the per-interrupt count. goodix_ts_read_input_report()
drops a report whose reported touch count is out of range:

	touch_num = data[0] & 0x0f;
	if (touch_num > ts->max_touch_num)
		return -EPROTO;

The only gap this patch closes is that ts->max_touch_num itself could be
larger than what point_data[] holds: it was taken straight from the 4-bit
config nibble (0..15), while the buffer is sized for GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS
(10) -- 2 + 9*10 = 92 bytes. A config advertising 11..15 made that -EPROTO
check accept an out-of-range touch_num and overflow the stack buffer.

Clamping max_touch_num to GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS at config-read time makes
that existing per-report drop a safe bound: a report claiming more than 10
contacts is now dropped with -EPROTO, and 10 is exactly point_data[]'s
capacity, so no legitimate report is lost (the driver maximum is 10, and
the other max_touch_num assignments already use GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS).

If you'd rather flag a bogus config than silently clamp it, I'm happy to
add a dev_warn_ratelimited() in a v2 -- just say the word.

Thanks,
Bryam


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-13  2:10 [PATCH] Input: goodix - clamp the device-reported contact count Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-13  2:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 11:44 ` Hans de Goede
2026-06-14 21:02   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-15 18:42     ` Bryam Vargas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615184204.26707-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --to=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox