Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Input: mms114 - replace BUG() and fix alignment
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 07:21:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616072133.158968-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616050912.1531241-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Replacing BUG() with WARN_ON() + return is the right call, and the rest of
the patch is fine.

One nit on the changelog though: this guard isn't reachable from userspace.
reg and len are always driver-internal constants -- there is no sysfs/debugfs/
ioctl that lets userspace pick a register, every __mms114_read_reg() call site
passes a fixed reg >= MMS114_INFORMATION (0x10), and the single MMS114_MODE_CONTROL
read is short-circuited by the cache in mms114_read_reg() before it ever reaches
__mms114_read_reg(). So the condition only fires if a *future in-kernel caller*
requests a read that spans the write-only MODE_CONTROL register -- a driver-
internal invariant, not a userspace-triggered one.

Worth tightening the wording, since that distinction is exactly what justifies
WARN_ON() here: a genuinely userspace-reachable WARN_ON() would itself be a
problem (log spam / panic_on_warn). Maybe something like:

  "Avoid taking the machine down with BUG() if a caller ever requests a read
   spanning the write-only MODE_CONTROL register; warn and return -EINVAL so
   the driver can recover."

The code is good either way.

Thanks,
Bryam


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16  5:09 [PATCH 1/6] Input: mms114 - fix touch indexing for MMS134S and MMS136 Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] Input: mms114 - prefer GPL over GPL v2 for module license Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] Input: mms114 - use appropriate register argument types Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  5:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] Input: mms114 - replace udelay with usleep_range Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  5:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] Input: mms114 - replace BUG() and fix alignment Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  7:21   ` Bryam Vargas [this message]
2026-06-16  5:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] Input: mms114 - refactor chip variant handling using descriptors Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16  5:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  7:42   ` Bryam Vargas
2026-06-16  5:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] Input: mms114 - fix touch indexing for MMS134S and MMS136 sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  7:05 ` Bryam Vargas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616072133.158968-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --to=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox