From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Input: mms114 - replace BUG() and fix alignment
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 07:21:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616072133.158968-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616050912.1531241-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Hi Dmitry,
Replacing BUG() with WARN_ON() + return is the right call, and the rest of
the patch is fine.
One nit on the changelog though: this guard isn't reachable from userspace.
reg and len are always driver-internal constants -- there is no sysfs/debugfs/
ioctl that lets userspace pick a register, every __mms114_read_reg() call site
passes a fixed reg >= MMS114_INFORMATION (0x10), and the single MMS114_MODE_CONTROL
read is short-circuited by the cache in mms114_read_reg() before it ever reaches
__mms114_read_reg(). So the condition only fires if a *future in-kernel caller*
requests a read that spans the write-only MODE_CONTROL register -- a driver-
internal invariant, not a userspace-triggered one.
Worth tightening the wording, since that distinction is exactly what justifies
WARN_ON() here: a genuinely userspace-reachable WARN_ON() would itself be a
problem (log spam / panic_on_warn). Maybe something like:
"Avoid taking the machine down with BUG() if a caller ever requests a read
spanning the write-only MODE_CONTROL register; warn and return -EINVAL so
the driver can recover."
The code is good either way.
Thanks,
Bryam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 5:09 [PATCH 1/6] Input: mms114 - fix touch indexing for MMS134S and MMS136 Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] Input: mms114 - prefer GPL over GPL v2 for module license Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] Input: mms114 - use appropriate register argument types Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 5:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] Input: mms114 - replace udelay with usleep_range Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 5:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] Input: mms114 - replace BUG() and fix alignment Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 7:21 ` Bryam Vargas [this message]
2026-06-16 5:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] Input: mms114 - refactor chip variant handling using descriptors Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-16 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 7:42 ` Bryam Vargas
2026-06-16 5:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] Input: mms114 - fix touch indexing for MMS134S and MMS136 sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 7:05 ` Bryam Vargas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616072133.158968-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--to=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox