From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iio: hid-sensors: add missing blank line after declarations
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:22:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616112206.F2BE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616-15-jun-hid-iio-alignment-v1-1-0cd544286575@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but pending asynchronous suspend work is cancelled during device removal, leaving hardware powered on indefinitely.
--
commit fb90a2bc06515600f67795b51872db81c06e23a2
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
iio: hid-sensors: add missing blank line after declarations
Add a blank line after variable declarations to improve
readability and align with kernel coding style.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> index 417c4ab8c1b27..c8ccf96f3d035 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused hid_sensor_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct hid_sensor_common *attrb = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
> +
> schedule_work(&attrb->work);
> +
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential problem where
pending asynchronous suspend work might be cancelled during device removal,
leaving the hardware powered on indefinitely.
During driver removal, iio_device_unregister() disables active iio buffers,
triggering buffer_predisable(). This calls hid_sensor_power_state() with
state false, which queues an asynchronous suspend:
hid_sensor_power_state() {
...
} else {
atomic_dec(&st->user_requested_state);
pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&st->pdev->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&st->pdev->dev);
}
...
}
Immediately after, hid_sensor_remove_trigger() is called:
hid_sensor_remove_trigger() {
if (atomic_read(&attrb->runtime_pm_enable))
pm_runtime_disable(&attrb->pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_set_suspended(&attrb->pdev->dev);
...
}
Because pm_runtime_disable() cancels any pending asynchronous idle/suspend
work, is it possible the autosuspend work gets cancelled before execution?
If the work is cancelled, pm_runtime_set_suspended() would only update the
software pm state, leaving the actual physical hardware permanently powered
on. Does the driver need a synchronous suspend in the removal path before
disabling runtime pm?
>
> @@ -322,6 +324,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused hid_sensor_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct hid_sensor_common *attrb = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
> +
> return _hid_sensor_power_state(attrb, true);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616-15-jun-hid-iio-alignment-v1-0-0cd544286575@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 10:26 [PATCH 00/11] HID: iio: warning clean up and prefer kernel coding style Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] iio: hid-sensors: add missing blank line after declarations Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: align parenthesis for readability Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 10:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-16 11:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 10:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] iio: magnetometer: hid-sensor-magn-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: use common device for devres Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] iio: position: hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] iio: temperature: hid-sensor-temperature: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] iio: hid-sensor-magn-3d: use ! instead of explicit NULL check Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:01 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] iio: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] iio: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] iio: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616112206.F2BE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox