From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - propagate F54 worker errors to V4L2 queue
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:30:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626073008.7C9131F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626051802.4033172-6-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The V4L2 video_device, vb2_queue, and mutex lock are embedded inside struct f54_data, which is allocated using devm_kzalloc(). When the device is unbound, devres frees f54_data immediately after rmi_f54_remove() returns. If a userspace process holds the /dev/videoX file descriptor open, subsequent V4L2 ioctl calls or close() operations will trigger a Use-After-Free.
- [Medium] The V4L2 buf_queue callback executes synchronous, blocking hardware polling via wait_for_completion_timeout(), turning an asynchronous queueing mechanism into a fully blocking operation that starves other ioctls.
--
commit ed5dda6c6cb42efd8468fff80b16a819c0e59afb
Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Input: synaptics-rmi4 - propagate F54 worker errors to V4L2 queue
Previously, rmi_f54_buffer_queue() waited for the worker thread to finish but
ignored whether it succeeded. This patch adds a report_error field to struct
f54_data to store the worker's exit status and marks the buffer with
VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR if the worker failed.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
> index e86dfc9ce7d9a..c86bc81845bb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct f54_data {
> u8 *report_data;
> size_t max_report_size;
> int report_size;
> + int report_error;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does using devres to allocate struct
f54_data create a use-after-free risk during device removal?
Since the V4L2 video_device, vb2_queue, and mutex lock are embedded inside
this structure, and it is allocated via devm_kzalloc() in rmi_f54_probe():
rmi_f54_probe() {
...
f54 = devm_kzalloc(&fn->dev, sizeof(struct f54_data), GFP_KERNEL);
...
}
The memory will be freed immediately when the device is unbound. If a
userspace process still holds the /dev/videoX file descriptor open,
subsequent V4L2 ioctl calls or close() operations could access the freed
video_device or queue.
[ ... ]
> @@ -340,6 +341,12 @@ static void rmi_f54_buffer_queue(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> mutex_lock(&f54->data_mutex);
> }
>
> + if (f54->report_error) {
> + dev_err(&f54->fn->dev, "Error acquiring report: %d\n", f54->report_error);
> + state = VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR;
> + goto data_done;
> + }
> +
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does waiting for the hardware
completion inside rmi_f54_buffer_queue() starve other concurrent V4L2
operations?
Just before this error check, rmi_f54_buffer_queue() executes:
rmi_f54_buffer_queue() {
...
while (f54->is_busy) {
mutex_unlock(&f54->data_mutex);
if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&f54->cmd_done, ...)) {
...
}
This executes synchronously while holding the V4L2 queue lock. Blocking here
via wait_for_completion_timeout() for up to 1000ms could prevent other users
from executing concurrent ioctls like DQBUF or STREAMOFF.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626051802.4033172-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 5:17 [PATCH 01/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix F55 transmitter electrode count typo Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - zero report size on F54 work error Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F54 report size to the allocated buffer Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - cancel delayed work on F54 remove Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - block s_input when F54 queue is busy Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - propagate F54 worker errors to V4L2 queue Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 7:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - check V4L2 buffer size in F54 queue Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - F54 style and typo fixes Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - change report_size to size_t in F54 Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - use __le16 for FIFO offset " Dmitry Torokhov
2026-06-26 5:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 5:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix F55 transmitter electrode count typo sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626073008.7C9131F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox