From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pengpeng Hou" <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: cyapa - validate unsupported PIP response length
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:38:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630073805.858061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026063008017969.1-ccfa108-0008-Input-cyapa---validate-unsu-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Stack buffer overflow in `cyapa_pip_irq_handler` when reading touch reports.
- [High] Stack out-of-bounds read in `cyapa_gen5_read_panel_scan_raw_data` during raw data parsing.
- [High] Stack out-of-bounds read and kernel infinite loop in `cyapa_gen5_read_idac_data`.
--
commit 577a902f2ff46d9f3cceff655a89f68889610a56
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Input: cyapa - validate unsupported PIP response length
cyapa_sort_tsg_pip_app_resp_data() accepts PIP application
responses after checking PIP_MIN_APP_RESP_LENGTH bytes. That covers
the application command byte at offset 4, but the unsupported-command
path also reads the status byte at PIP_RESP_STATUS_OFFSET.
A short response can advertise PIP_UNSUPPORTED_CMD_RESP_LENGTH in the
response header while the supplied buffer still contains only the generic
minimum response. Validate the unsupported response length before reading
the status byte.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen5.c b/drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen5.c
> index 59f6e97d54827..733da6d324331 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen5.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen5.c
> @@ -686,6 +686,7 @@ bool cyapa_sort_tsg_pip_app_resp_data(struct cyapa *cyapa,
> u8 *data, int len)
> {
> struct cyapa_pip_cmd_states *pip = &cyapa->cmd_states.pip;
> + u8 cmd_code;
> int resp_len;
>
> if (!data || len < PIP_MIN_APP_RESP_LENGTH)
[ ... ]
> /* Read mutual global idac or local mutual/self PWC data. */
> offset += read_len;
> for (i = 10; i < (read_len + GEN5_RESP_DATA_STRUCTURE_OFFSET);
> i += *data_size) {
> value = cyapa_parse_structure_data(resp_data[9],
> &resp_data[i], *data_size);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this loop in
cyapa_gen5_read_idac_data() risk an infinite loop or out-of-bounds read?
If a malicious I2C peripheral sets the data size (derived from resp_data[9])
to 0, wouldn't the loop fail to increment i and hang the CPU?
Additionally, doesn't blindly trusting read_len (derived from resp_data[7:8])
for the loop bound risk reading past the bounds of the 256-byte resp_data
stack array?
[ ... ]
> read_elements = get_unaligned_le16(&resp_data[7]);
> if (read_elements == 0)
> break;
>
> data_size = (resp_data[9] & GEN5_PWC_DATA_ELEMENT_SIZE_MASK);
> offset += read_elements;
> if (read_elements) {
> for (i = GEN5_RESP_DATA_STRUCTURE_OFFSET;
> i < (read_elements * data_size +
> GEN5_RESP_DATA_STRUCTURE_OFFSET);
> i += data_size) {
> value = cyapa_parse_structure_data(resp_data[9],
> &resp_data[i], data_size);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this risk an out-of-bounds
read on the kernel stack in cyapa_gen5_read_panel_scan_raw_data()?
If the device returns a large read_elements value, the loop condition appears
to allow cyapa_parse_structure_data() to read far beyond the bounds of the
256-byte resp_data stack array.
[ ... ]
> int cyapa_pip_irq_handler(struct cyapa *cyapa)
> {
> struct device *dev = &cyapa->client->dev;
> struct cyapa_pip_report_data report_data;
> unsigned int report_len;
> int ret;
>
> if (!cyapa_is_pip_app_mode(cyapa)) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid device state, gen=%d, state=0x%02x\n",
> cyapa->gen, cyapa->state);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> ret = cyapa_i2c_pip_read(cyapa, (u8 *)&report_data,
> PIP_RESP_LENGTH_SIZE);
[ ... ]
> /* Idle, no data for report. */
> if (report_len == PIP_RESP_LENGTH_SIZE)
> return 0;
>
> ret = cyapa_i2c_pip_read(cyapa, (u8 *)&report_data, report_len);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this lead to a stack buffer overflow
in cyapa_pip_irq_handler()?
The report_data structure is 127 bytes on the stack, but an untrusted
report_len from the device is used in cyapa_i2c_pip_read(). Since the read
wrapper only caps the length to 256 bytes (CYAPA_REG_MAP_SIZE), can't a
compromised peripheral supply a length that overflows the buffer and corrupts
the stack?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/2026063008017969.1-ccfa108-0008-Input-cyapa---validate-unsu-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 7:19 [PATCH] Input: cyapa - validate unsupported PIP response length Pengpeng Hou
2026-06-30 7:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630073805.858061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox