From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] platform/chrome: of_hw_prober: Add delay for hana trackpads
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:10:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703121042.46BEB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703115601.1323491-6-wenst@chromium.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The result of regulator_is_enabled() is assigned to or bitwise-ANDed with a boolean variable, causing negative error codes to incorrectly evaluate to true and skip required hardware initialization delays.
--
commit 1aa1abec8abc658e89bd1583fb36c5b23bda7cf8
Author: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
platform/chrome: of_hw_prober: Add delay for hana trackpads
Up until now, the MT8173 elm/hana device tree has set the dedicated
regulator supplying the trackpad as always-on, simply because the Elan
driver was missing proper delays. As a result the delay for the
Synaptics trackpad was also omitted, as it was not strictly required
under such a model and delayed the availability of the trackpad to the
user.
> The Elan driver recently gained proper delays after power-up, with
> adaptive skipping of the delay if the regulator was originally
> on. The I2C HID driver and I2C OF component prober library gained
> similar adaptive delay skipping. The device tree will be fixed to have
> the regulator not be always on, and proper post-power-on delay time
> added to the I2C HID device.
[Severity: High]
Does the adaptive skipping logic mentioned here safely handle negative error
codes from regulator_is_enabled()?
Looking at the implementations of this adaptive skipping,
regulator_is_enabled() can return a negative error code (e.g., -EIO, -EBUSY)
on failure, but this result is being directly assigned to or bitwise-ANDed
with a boolean.
For example, in drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-of.c:i2c_hid_of_power_up():
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ihid_of->supplies); i++)
supply_was_enabled &= regulator_is_enabled(ihid_of->supplies[i].consumer);
Since supply_was_enabled is promoted to int for the bitwise AND, does this
outcome depend on the parity of the error code? It looks like odd errors
(like -EIO) will yield true (skipping the delay), while even errors (like
-EBUSY) will yield false.
Similarly, in drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c:
i2c_of_probe_simple_enable_regulator():
supply_was_on = regulator_is_enabled(ctx->supply);
And in drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c:elan_probe() and elan_resume():
supply_was_enabled = regulator_is_enabled(data->vcc);
Since any non-zero integer evaluates to true in C, assigning a negative error
code directly to a bool means all errors will incorrectly signal that the
regulator was already on.
Could this cause a regression where a transient I2C or hardware error when
querying the regulator state makes the driver incorrectly skip required
hardware initialization delays and fail the device probe?
> Also add the post-power-on delay to the ChromeOS OF component prober,
> so that if the regulator is off at the time of probing, the prober knows
> to wait for the hardware to initialize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703115601.1323491-1-wenst@chromium.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 11:55 [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: mediatek: Chromebook trackpad supply fixes Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] Input: elan_i2c - Wait for initialization after enabling regulator supply Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] HID: i2c-hid-of: skip post-power-on delay if already powered on Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] i2c: of-prober: " Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] i2c: of-prober: Defer regulator_disable() on successful probe in simple helper Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] platform/chrome: of_hw_prober: Add delay for hana trackpads Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 12:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-03 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Unmark trackpad supply as always-on Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-03 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192-asurada-spherion: Add Synaptics trackpad's supply Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703121042.46BEB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox