From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 12:25:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707122542.E65C11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707121051.1683937-4-lee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent sibling unbind causes Use-After-Free in wacom_mode_change_work()
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/4] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle ---
commit 5aab8fc5d0e17a15712b387b6273c3b728adb79d
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle
The Wacom driver coordinates state between sibling interfaces of the same
physical device using a shared structure 'wacom_shared' inside
'wacom_hdev_data'. This patch redesigns the sibling data lifecycle to use
stable static attributes for sibling matching and serializes refcount drops
in wacom_remove_shared_data().
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -883,17 +900,19 @@ static void wacom_remove_shared_data(void *res)
> rcu_dereference_protected(wacom_wac->shared->pen,
> lockdep_is_held(&wacom_udev_list_lock));
>
> - if (touch == wacom->hdev) {
> + if (touch == res_wacom->hdev) {
> rcu_assign_pointer(wacom_wac->shared->touch, NULL);
> rcu_assign_pointer(wacom_wac->shared->touch_input, NULL);
> - } else if (pen == wacom->hdev) {
> + } else if (pen == res_wacom->hdev) {
> rcu_assign_pointer(wacom_wac->shared->pen, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> synchronize_rcu();
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing these RCU lifecycle changes,
I noticed a potential use-after-free condition involving the pointers being
managed here.
When a sibling interface is concurrently unbound, wacom_remove_shared_data()
clears the pointer and calls synchronize_rcu() here.
However, looking at wacom_mode_change_work() in drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c, the
shared sibling pointers are accessed without holding an RCU read lock:
struct hid_device *touch = rcu_access_pointer(shared->touch);
if (touch) {
wacom2 = hid_get_drvdata(touch);
wacom_release_resources(wacom2);
hid_hw_stop(wacom2->hdev);
}
Because wacom_mode_change_work() does not enter an RCU read-side critical
section, synchronize_rcu() won't wait for it to finish before returning
and allowing the sibling device to be freed.
Could this sequence lead to a use-after-free if wacom_mode_change_work()
subsequently dereferences the touch device pointer after it has been freed
by the driver core?
> - kref_put(&data->kref, wacom_release_shared_data);
> + if (kref_put_mutex(&data->kref, wacom_release_shared_data, &wacom_udev_list_lock))
> + mutex_unlock(&wacom_udev_list_lock);
> +
> wacom_wac->shared = NULL;
> }
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707121051.1683937-1-lee@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 12:10 [PATCH 1/4] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration Lee Jones
2026-07-07 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad Lee Jones
2026-07-07 12:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 12:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad Lee Jones
2026-07-07 12:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 12:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle Lee Jones
2026-07-07 12:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707122542.E65C11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox